Biofilm formation on nanostructured hydroxyapatite‐coated titanium

  • Emma Westas
    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Applied Chemistry Chalmers University of Technology 412 96 Göteborg Sweden
  • Martin Gillstedt
    Department of Dermatology Sahlgrenska University Hospital 413 45 Göteborg Sweden
  • Jessica Lönn‐Stensrud
    Department of Oral Biology Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Blindern NO‐0316 Oslo Norway
  • Ellen Bruzell
    Nordic Institute of Dental Materials (NIOM as) NO‐0805 Oslo Norway
  • Martin Andersson
    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Applied Chemistry Chalmers University of Technology 412 96 Göteborg Sweden

書誌事項

公開日
2013-06-12
権利情報
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
DOI
  • 10.1002/jbm.a.34757
公開者
Wiley

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Biofilm formation on medical devices is a common cause of implant failure, especially regarding implants that breach the epithelial tissue, so‐called transcutaneous implants. Nanotechnology and the development of new nanomaterials have given the opportunity to design nanotextured implant surfaces. Such surfaces have been studied using various <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> methods showing that nanosized features strongly benefit bone cell growth. However, little is known on how nanostructured features affect biofilm formation. The aim of this study was therefore to examine the shape‐ and chemical‐dependent effect of a nanostructured hydroxyapatite (HA) coating on the degree of <jats:italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</jats:italic> biofilm formation. Three different types of nanosized HA particles having different shapes and calcium to phosphate ratios were compared to uncoated turned titanium using safranin stain in a biofilm assay and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) for assessment of biofilm biomass and bacterial volume, respectively. No difference in biofilm biomass was detected for the various surfaces after 6 h incubation with <jats:italic>S. epidermidis</jats:italic>. Additionally, image analysis of CLSM Z‐stacks confirmed the biofilm assay and showed similar results. In conclusion, the difference in nanomorphology and chemical composition of the surface coatings did not influence the adhesion and biofilm formation of <jats:italic>S. epidermidis</jats:italic>. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 102A: 1063–1070, 2014.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ