Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group

  • David G. Jayne
    From the Academic Unit of Surgery, St James's University Hospital; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds; and the Academic Unit of Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Pierre J. Guillou
    From the Academic Unit of Surgery, St James's University Hospital; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds; and the Academic Unit of Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Helen Thorpe
    From the Academic Unit of Surgery, St James's University Hospital; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds; and the Academic Unit of Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Philip Quirke
    From the Academic Unit of Surgery, St James's University Hospital; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds; and the Academic Unit of Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Joanne Copeland
    From the Academic Unit of Surgery, St James's University Hospital; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds; and the Academic Unit of Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Adrian M.H. Smith
    From the Academic Unit of Surgery, St James's University Hospital; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds; and the Academic Unit of Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Richard M. Heath
    From the Academic Unit of Surgery, St James's University Hospital; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds; and the Academic Unit of Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Julia M. Brown
    From the Academic Unit of Surgery, St James's University Hospital; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds; and the Academic Unit of Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

書誌事項

公開日
2007-07-20
DOI
  • 10.1200/jco.2006.09.7758
公開者
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p> The aim of the current study is to report the long-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted surgery compared with conventional open surgery within the context of the UK MRC CLASICC trial. Results from randomized trials have indicated that laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is as effective as open surgery in the short term. Few data are available on rectal cancer, and long-term data on survival and recurrence are now required. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> The United Kingdom Medical Research Council Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer (UK MRC CLASICC; clinical trials number ISRCTN 74883561) trial study comparing conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with cancer of the colon and rectum. The randomization ratio was 2:1 in favor of laparoscopic surgery. Long-term outcomes (3-year overall survival [OS], disease-free survival [DFS], local recurrence, and quality of life [QoL]) have now been determined on an intention-to-treat basis. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Seven hundred ninety-four patients were recruited (526 laparoscopic and 268 open). Overall, there were no differences in the long-term outcomes. The differences in survival rates were OS of 1.8% (95% CI, −5.2% to 8.8%; P = .55), DFS of −1.4% (95% CI, −9.5% to 6.7%; P = .70), local recurrence of −0.8% (95% CI, −5.7% to 4.2%; P = .76), and QoL (P > .01 for all scales). Higher positivity of the circumferential resection margin was reported after laparoscopic anterior resection (AR), but it did not translate into an increased incidence of local recurrence. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> Successful laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer is as effective as open surgery in terms of oncological outcomes and preservation of QoL. Long-term outcomes for patients with rectal cancer were similar in those undergoing abdominoperineal resection and AR, and support the continued use of laparoscopic surgery in these patients. </jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (51)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ