Combined Androgen and Estrogen Receptor Status in Breast Cancer: Treatment Prediction and Prognosis in a Population-Based Prospective Cohort

  • Karin Elebro
    1Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
  • Signe Borgquist
    1Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
  • Maria Simonsson
    1Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
  • Andrea Markkula
    1Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
  • Karin Jirström
    1Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
  • Christian Ingvar
    4Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund, Sweden.
  • Carsten Rose
    5Lund University, CREATE Health and Department of Immunotechnology, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
  • Helena Jernström
    1Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Purpose: To evaluate whether tumor androgen receptor (AR) expression was prognostic and/or predictive for endocrine treatment alone or in combination with estrogen receptor (ER). The AR has been hypothesized to have differential prognostic roles in breast cancer depending on tumor ER status, and to influence endocrine treatment response.</jats:p> <jats:p>Experimental Design: A population-based prospective cohort of 1,026 patients diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer in Lund, Sweden, between 2002 and 2012 was followed until June 2014. Associations between immunohistochemical AR expression in tumor tissue microarrays, patient and tumor characteristics, and AR genotypes were analyzed. Disease-free survival (DFS) by AR status, and combined ER/AR status was assessed in various treatment groups.</jats:p> <jats:p>Results: AR expression was assessable in 913 tumors. AR+ tumors (85.0%) were associated with higher age (P = 0.036) and favorable tumor characteristics. The AR+ status was a prognostic marker for DFS (LogRank P = 0.025). There was an interaction between AR and ER expression with respect to prognosis (adjusted Pinteraction ≤ 0.024). Tumors with discordant hormone receptor expressions (ER+AR− or ER−AR+) demonstrated worse prognosis compared with concordant tumor expressions (ER+AR+ or ER−AR−) in multivariable models [adjusted HRs (95% confidence intervals); ≥1.99 (1.28–3.10), P ≤ 0.002]. ER+AR− indicated early treatment failure with aromatase inhibitors (AI) among chemonaïve patients aged 50 or older.</jats:p> <jats:p>Conclusions: Prediction of breast cancer prognosis and treatment response was improved by combining AR and ER status. AR negativity predicted early treatment failure with AI but not tamoxifen, a finding that warrants confirmation in a randomized setting. Patients may benefit from anti-androgens or selective AR modulators. Clin Cancer Res; 21(16); 3640–50. ©2015 AACR.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Clinical Cancer Research

    Clinical Cancer Research 21 (16), 3640-3650, 2015-08-13

    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ