Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the Combination of Sorafenib and Tanespimycin

  • Ulka N. Vaishampayan
    Authors' Affiliations: 1Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Wayne State University; 2Biostatistics Unit, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; 3Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; 4Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Branch, Bethesda, Maryland; and 6Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Angelika M. Burger
    Authors' Affiliations: 1Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Wayne State University; 2Biostatistics Unit, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; 3Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; 4Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Branch, Bethesda, Maryland; and 6Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Edward A. Sausville
    Authors' Affiliations: 1Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Wayne State University; 2Biostatistics Unit, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; 3Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; 4Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Branch, Bethesda, Maryland; and 6Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Lance K. Heilbrun
    Authors' Affiliations: 1Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Wayne State University; 2Biostatistics Unit, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; 3Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; 4Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Branch, Bethesda, Maryland; and 6Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Jing Li
    Authors' Affiliations: 1Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Wayne State University; 2Biostatistics Unit, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; 3Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; 4Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Branch, Bethesda, Maryland; and 6Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • M. Naomi Horiba
    Authors' Affiliations: 1Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Wayne State University; 2Biostatistics Unit, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; 3Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; 4Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Branch, Bethesda, Maryland; and 6Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Merrill J. Egorin
    Authors' Affiliations: 1Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Wayne State University; 2Biostatistics Unit, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; 3Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; 4Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Branch, Bethesda, Maryland; and 6Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Percy Ivy
    Authors' Affiliations: 1Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Wayne State University; 2Biostatistics Unit, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; 3Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; 4Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Branch, Bethesda, Maryland; and 6Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Simon Pacey
    Authors' Affiliations: 1Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Wayne State University; 2Biostatistics Unit, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; 3Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; 4Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Branch, Bethesda, Maryland; and 6Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Patricia M. LoRusso
    Authors' Affiliations: 1Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Wayne State University; 2Biostatistics Unit, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan; 3Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; 4Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Branch, Bethesda, Maryland; and 6Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Purpose: Heat shock protein (Hsp) 90 inhibition affects the Raf kinase signaling pathway and could enhance antitumor effects of sorafenib, a Raf kinase inhibitor. The combination of sorafenib and tanespimycin [17-allyl-amino-geldanamycin (17-AAG); NSC 330507/KOS-953] was evaluated in a phase I trial with the primary objective of defining a phase II dose.</jats:p> <jats:p>Patients and Methods: The dose cohorts consisted of fixed continuous oral dosing of 400 mg sorafenib twice daily, starting at 14 days before tanespimycin, which was administered intravenously at escalating doses (starting at 300 mg/m,2 with 50 mg/m2 increments), on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle. Toxicity was assessed weekly, and response was evaluated every two cycles.</jats:p> <jats:p>Results: Twenty-seven toxicity-evaluable patients were enrolled and treated at four dose levels. Predominant primary malignancies were renal cancer (12), melanoma (6), and colorectal cancer (4). Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 4 transaminitis and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in one patient each were observed at 450 mg/m2 of tanespimycin. One hundred fourteen cycles were administered with a median of four cycles (range 1–17 cycles). Plasma concentrations of sorafenib and metabolites reached steady state after 7 days. Tanespimycin did not alter sorafenib concentrations. Pharmacodynamics showed a decrease in Hsp90 levels and induction of Hsp70. Clinical efficacy was observed in 9 of 12 renal cancer patients and 4 of 6 melanoma patients</jats:p> <jats:p>Conclusions: Recommended phase II doses of this combination are 400 mg sorafenib twice daily and 400 mg/m2 tanespimycin on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days. Clinical and pharmacodynamic activity was observed in kidney cancer and melanoma. Clin Cancer Res; 16(14); 3795–804. ©2010 AACR.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Clinical Cancer Research

    Clinical Cancer Research 16 (14), 3795-3804, 2010-07-14

    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

被引用文献 (4)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ