Side Population is Not Necessary or Sufficient for a Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype in Glioblastoma Multiforme

  • Kate W. R. Broadley
    Cell Survival Group, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand
  • Martin K. Hunn
    Vaccine Research Group, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand
  • Kathryn J. Farrand
    Vaccine Research Group, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand
  • Kylie M. Price
    Flow Cytometry Facility, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand
  • Carole Grasso
    Cell Survival Group, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand
  • Rose J. Miller
    Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand
  • Ian F. Hermans
    Vaccine Research Group, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand
  • Melanie J. McConnell
    Cell Survival Group, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand

Description

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>There is strong evidence for the existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in the aggressive brain tumor glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). These cells have stem-like self-renewal activity and increased tumor initiation capacity and are believed to be responsible for recurrence due to their resistance to therapy. Several techniques have been used to enrich for CSC, including growth in serum-free defined media to induce sphere formation, and isolation of a stem-like cell using exclusion of the fluorescent dye Hoechst 33342, the side population (SP). We show that sphere formation in GBM cell lines and primary GBM cells enriches for a CSC-like phenotype of increased self-renewal gene expression in vitro and increased tumor initiation in vivo. However, the SP was absent from all sphere cultures. Direct isolation of the SP from the GBM lines did not enrich for stem-like activity in vitro, and tumor-initiating activity was lower in sorted SP compared with non-SP and parental cells. Transient exposure to doxorubicin enhanced both CSC and SP frequency. However, doxorubicin treatment altered the cytometric profile and obscured the SP demonstrating the difficulty of identifying SP in cells under stress. Doxorubicin-exposed cells showed a transient increase in SP, but the doxorubicin-SP cells were still not enriched for a stem-like self-renewal phenotype. These data demonstrate that the GBM SP does not necessarily contribute to self-renewal or tumor initiation, key properties of a CSC, and we advise against using SP to enumerate or isolate CSC.</jats:p>

Journal

  • Stem Cells

    Stem Cells 29 (3), 452-461, 2011-03-01

    Oxford University Press (OUP)

Citations (3)*help

See more

Report a problem

Back to top