Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6–10 mm: a randomized trial
-
- Vasilios Papastergiou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
-
- Konstantina Paraskeva
- Department of Gastroenterology, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
-
- Maria Fragaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
-
- Ioannis Dimas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
-
- Emmanouil Vardas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
-
- Angeliki Theodoropoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
-
- Nicoletta Mathou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
-
- Athanasios Giannakopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
-
- Konstantinos Karmiris
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
-
- Afroditi Mpitouli
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
-
- Dimitra Apessou
- Department of Histopathology, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
-
- Linda Giannikaki
- Department of Histopathology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
-
- John Karagiannis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
-
- Grigorios Chlouverakis
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Crete, Medical College, Heraklion, Greece
-
- Gregorios Paspatis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
説明
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> Background and study aims Cold snare polypectomy is an established method for the resection of small colorectal polyps; however, significant incomplete resection rates still leave room for improvement. We aimed to assess the efficacy of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR), compared with hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR), for nonpedunculated polyps sized 6 – 10 mm. </jats:p><jats:p> Patients and methods This study was a dual-center, randomized, noninferiority trial. Consecutive adult patients with at least one nonpedunculated polyp sized 6 – 10 mm were enrolled. Eligible polyps were randomized (1:1) to be treated with either CS-EMR or HS-EMR. Both methods involved submucosal injection of a methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution. The primary noninferiority end point was histological eradication evaluated by postpolypectomy biopsies (noninferiority margin – 10 %). Secondary outcomes included occurrence of intraprocedural bleeding, clinically significant postprocedural bleeding, and perforation. </jats:p><jats:p> Results Among 689 patients screened, 155 patients with 164 eligible polyps were included (CS-EMR n = 83, HS-EMR n = 81). The overall rate of histological complete resection was 92.8 % in the CS-EMR group and 96.3 % in the HS-EMR group (difference 3.5 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] – 4.15 to 11.56), showing noninferiority of CS-EMR compared with HS-EMR. CS-EMR was shown to be noninferior both for polyps measuring 6 – 7 mm (CS-EMR 93.3 %; HS-EMR 100 %; 95 %CI – 7.95 to 21.3) and those of 8 – 10 mm (92.5 % vs. 94.7 %, respectively; 95 %CI – 7.91 to 13.16). Rates of intraprocedural bleeding were similar between the two groups (CS-EMR 3.6 %, HS-EMR 1.2 %; P = 0.30). No clinically significant postprocedural bleeding or perforation occurred in either group.</jats:p><jats:p> Conclusions CS-EMR appears to be a valuable modification of the standard cold snare technique, obviating the need to use diathermy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6 – 10 mm. </jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Endoscopy
-
Endoscopy 50 (04), 403-411, 2017-09-12
Georg Thieme Verlag KG