A Retrospective Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Gefitinib, Erlotinib, and Afatinib in Japanese Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

DOI Web Site 25 References Open Access
  • Atsushi Fujiwara
    Department of Respiratory Medicine, Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Yokkaichi, Mie, Japan
  • Masamichi Yoshida
    Department of Respiratory Medicine, Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Yokkaichi, Mie, Japan
  • Hajime Fujimoto
    Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
  • Hiroki Nakahara
    Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
  • Kentaro Ito
    Respiratory Center, Matsusaka Municipal Hospital, Mie, Japan
  • Kota Nishihama
    Department of Immunology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
  • Taro Yasuma
    Department of Immunology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
  • Osamu Hataji
    Respiratory Center, Matsusaka Municipal Hospital, Mie, Japan
  • Osamu Taguchi
    Mie University Center for Physical and Mental Health, Tsu, Mie, Japan
  • Corina N. D’Alessandro-Gabazza
    Department of Immunology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
  • Esteban C. Gabazza
    Department of Immunology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
  • Tetsu Kobayashi
    Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan

Abstract

<jats:p>Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are very effective against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) caused by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Before the approval of osimertinib in March 2016, there were only three available EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib) for the therapy of NSCLC in Japan. Osimertinib can be indicated only against T790M<jats:sup>+</jats:sup> lung cancer as a second-line therapy. However, whether gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib is most appropriate as a first-line therapy is still a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 310 patients with the diagnosis of EGFR mutation-associated NSCLC including 147 patients treated with EGFR TKIs. Time to treatment failure and overall survival were evaluated. There were no significant differences in time to treatment failure (gefitinib: 9.2 months; erlotinib: 9.8 months; afatinib: 13.1 months) and overall survival (gefitinib: 27.3 months; erlotinib: 29.3 months; afatinib data not available) among NSCLC patients treated with the three different EGFR TKIs. Subgroup analysis showed that smoking status has a significant influence on both time to treatment failure and overall survival. In conclusion, this study showed comparable clinical efficacy of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib in Japanese patients with NSCLC.</jats:p>

Journal

References(25)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top