Assessing the stability of human locomotion: a review of current measures

<jats:p> Falling poses a major threat to the steadily growing population of the elderly in modern-day society. A major challenge in the prevention of falls is the identification of individuals who are at risk of falling owing to an unstable gait. At present, several methods are available for estimating gait stability, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, we review the currently available measures: the maximum Lyapunov exponent ( <jats:italic>λ</jats:italic> <jats:sub>S</jats:sub> and <jats:italic>λ</jats:italic> <jats:sub>L</jats:sub> ), the maximum Floquet multiplier, variability measures, long-range correlations, extrapolated centre of mass, stabilizing and destabilizing forces, foot placement estimator, gait sensitivity norm and maximum allowable perturbation. We explain what these measures represent and how they are calculated, and we assess their validity, divided up into construct validity, predictive validity in simple models, convergent validity in experimental studies, and predictive validity in observational studies. We conclude that (i) the validity of variability measures and <jats:italic>λ</jats:italic> <jats:sub>S</jats:sub> is best supported across all levels, (ii) the maximum Floquet multiplier and <jats:italic>λ</jats:italic> <jats:sub>L</jats:sub> have good construct validity, but negative predictive validity in models, negative convergent validity and (for <jats:italic>λ</jats:italic> <jats:sub>L</jats:sub> ) negative predictive validity in observational studies, (iii) long-range correlations lack construct validity and predictive validity in models and have negative convergent validity, and (iv) measures derived from perturbation experiments have good construct validity, but data are lacking on convergent validity in experimental studies and predictive validity in observational studies. In closing, directions for future research on dynamic gait stability are discussed. </jats:p>