AN ERROR IN ERROR ANALYSIS<sup>1</sup>

説明

<jats:p>Presently, a number of proponents of an error analysis approach to the investigation of 2nd language learning argue that contrastive analysis (CA) <jats:italic>apriori</jats:italic> is inadequate as an account of target language learning problems. They claim that the only tenable version of CA is an <jats:italic>aposteriori</jats:italic> approach, i.e. CA in just those areas that have been proven by error analysis to be difficulties in production. This claim is disputed in a study involving the acquisition of English relative clauses by speakers of Persian, Arabic, Chinese, and Japanese. The <jats:italic>aposteriori</jats:italic> approach obscured the fact that the Chinese and Japanese learners have more difficulty with relative clauses and therefore avoid them, a fact predicted by the <jats:italic>apriori</jats:italic> approach.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (4)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ