Ecological opportunities and specializations shaped genetic divergence in a highly mobile marine top predator

  • Marie Louis
    Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS-Université de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France
  • Michael C. Fontaine
    Marine Evolution and Conservation, Centre of Evolutionary and Ecological Studies, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Jérôme Spitz
    Observatoire PELAGIS, UMS 3462 CNRS-Université La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France
  • Erika Schlund
    Littoral Environnement et Sociétés, UMR 7266 CNRS-Université de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France
  • Willy Dabin
    Observatoire PELAGIS, UMS 3462 CNRS-Université La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France
  • Rob Deaville
    Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK
  • Florence Caurant
    Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS-Université de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France
  • Yves Cherel
    Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS-Université de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France
  • Christophe Guinet
    Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS-Université de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France
  • Benoit Simon-Bouhet
    Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 CNRS-Université de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France

抄録

<jats:p>Environmental conditions can shape genetic and morphological divergence. Release of new habitats during historical environmental changes was a major driver of evolutionary diversification. Here, forces shaping population structure and ecotype differentiation (‘pelagic’ and ‘coastal’) of bottlenose dolphins in the North-east Atlantic were investigated using complementary evolutionary and ecological approaches. Inference of population demographic history using approximate Bayesian computation indicated that coastal populations were likely founded by the Atlantic pelagic population after the Last Glacial Maxima probably as a result of newly available coastal ecological niches. Pelagic dolphins from the Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea likely diverged during a period of high productivity in the Mediterranean Sea. Genetic differentiation between coastal and pelagic ecotypes may be maintained by niche specializations, as indicated by stable isotope and stomach content analyses, and social behaviour. The two ecotypes were only weakly morphologically segregated in contrast to other parts of the World Ocean. This may be linked to weak contrasts between coastal and pelagic habitats and/or a relatively recent divergence. We suggest that ecological opportunity to specialize is a major driver of genetic and morphological divergence. Combining genetic, ecological and morphological approaches is essential to understanding the population structure of mobile and cryptic species.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (3)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ