Predicting Hard Rock Pillar Stability Using GBDT, XGBoost, and LightGBM Algorithms

  • Weizhang Liang
    School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
  • Suizhi Luo
    College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
  • Guoyan Zhao
    School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
  • Hao Wu
    School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

書誌事項

公開日
2020-05-11
権利情報
  • https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DOI
  • 10.3390/math8050765
公開者
MDPI AG

説明

<jats:p>Predicting pillar stability is a vital task in hard rock mines as pillar instability can cause large-scale collapse hazards. However, it is challenging because the pillar stability is affected by many factors. With the accumulation of pillar stability cases, machine learning (ML) has shown great potential to predict pillar stability. This study aims to predict hard rock pillar stability using gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) algorithms. First, 236 cases with five indicators were collected from seven hard rock mines. Afterwards, the hyperparameters of each model were tuned using a five-fold cross validation (CV) approach. Based on the optimal hyperparameters configuration, prediction models were constructed using training set (70% of the data). Finally, the test set (30% of the data) was adopted to evaluate the performance of each model. The precision, recall, and F1 indexes were utilized to analyze prediction results of each level, and the accuracy and their macro average values were used to assess the overall prediction performance. Based on the sensitivity analysis of indicators, the relative importance of each indicator was obtained. In addition, the safety factor approach and other ML algorithms were adopted as comparisons. The results showed that GBDT, XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms achieved a better comprehensive performance, and their prediction accuracies were 0.8310, 0.8310, and 0.8169, respectively. The average pillar stress and ratio of pillar width to pillar height had the most important influences on prediction results. The proposed methodology can provide a reliable reference for pillar design and stability risk management.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Mathematics

    Mathematics 8 (5), 765-, 2020-05-11

    MDPI AG

被引用文献 (4)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ