Roller-Massager Application to the Quadriceps and Knee-Joint Range of Motion and Neuromuscular Efficiency During a Lunge
-
- David J. Bradbury-Squires
- School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada
-
- Jennifer C. Noftall
- School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada
-
- Kathleen M. Sullivan
- School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada
-
- David G. Behm
- School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada
-
- Kevin E. Power
- School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada
-
- Duane C. Button
- School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada
抄録
<jats:sec> <jats:title>Context:</jats:title> <jats:p>Roller massagers are used as a recovery and rehabilitative tool to initiate muscle relaxation and improve range of motion (ROM) and muscular performance. However, research demonstrating such effects is lacking.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Objective:</jats:title> <jats:p>To determine the effects of applying a roller massager for 20 and 60 seconds on knee-joint ROM and dynamic muscular performance.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Design:</jats:title> <jats:p>Randomized controlled clinical trial.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Setting:</jats:title> <jats:p>University laboratory.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Patients or Other Participants:</jats:title> <jats:p>Ten recreationally active men (age = 26.6 ± 5.2 years, height = 175.3 ± 4.3 cm, mass = 84.4 ± 8.8 kg).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Intervention(s):</jats:title> <jats:p>Participants performed 3 randomized experimental conditions separated by 24 to 48 hours. In condition 1 (5 repetitions of 20 seconds) and condition 2 (5 repetitions of 60 seconds), they applied a roller massager to the quadriceps muscles. Condition 3 served as a control condition in which participants sat quietly.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Main Outcome Measure(s):</jats:title> <jats:p>Visual analog pain scale, electromyography (EMG) of the vastus lateralis (VL) and biceps femoris during roller massage and lunge, and knee-joint ROM.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results:</jats:title> <jats:p>We found no differences in pain between the 20-second and 60-second roller-massager conditions. During 60 seconds of roller massage, pain was 13.5% (5.7 ± 0.70) and 20.6% (6.2 ± 0.70) greater at 40 seconds and 60 seconds, respectively, than at 20 seconds (P < .05). During roller massage, VL and biceps femoris root mean square (RMS) EMG was 8% and 7%, respectively, of RMS EMG recorded during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. Knee-joint ROM was 10% and 16% greater in the 20-second and 60-second roller-massager conditions, respectively, than the control condition (P < .05). Finally, average lunge VL RMS EMG decreased as roller-massage time increased (P < .05).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title> <jats:p>Roller massage was painful and induced muscle activity, but it increased knee-joint ROM and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- Journal of Athletic Training
-
Journal of Athletic Training 50 (2), 133-140, 2015-02-01
Journal of Athletic Training/NATA