Linking the evolution and form of warning coloration in nature

DOI Web Site Web Site 1 Citations
  • Martin Stevens
    Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
  • Graeme D. Ruxton
    College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

Description

<jats:p>Many animals are toxic or unpalatable and signal this to predators with warning signals (aposematism). Aposematic appearance has long been a classical system to study predator–prey interactions, communication and signalling, and animal behaviour and learning. The area has received considerable empirical and theoretical investigation. However, most research has centred on understanding the initial evolution of aposematism, despite the fact that these studies often tell us little about the form and diversity of real warning signals in nature. In contrast, less attention has been given to the mechanistic basis of aposematic markings; that is, ‘what makes an effective warning signal?’, and the efficacy of warning signals has been neglected. Furthermore, unlike other areas of adaptive coloration research (such as camouflage and mate choice), studies of warning coloration have often been slow to address predator vision and psychology. Here, we review the current understanding of warning signal form, with an aim to comprehend the diversity of warning signals in nature. We present hypotheses and suggestions for future work regarding our current understanding of several inter-related questions covering the form of warning signals and their relationship with predator vision, learning, and links to broader issues in evolutionary ecology such as mate choice and speciation.</jats:p>

Journal

Citations (1)*help

See more

Report a problem

Back to top