High-Throughput Genomics and Clinical Outcome in Hard-to-Treat Advanced Cancers: Results of the MOSCATO 01 Trial

  • Christophe Massard
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Stefan Michiels
    2Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Service de biostatistique et d'épidémiologie, Villejuif, France; CESP, INSERM, Fac. de médecine–Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay Villejuif, France.
  • Charles Ferté
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Marie-Cécile Le Deley
    2Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Service de biostatistique et d'épidémiologie, Villejuif, France; CESP, INSERM, Fac. de médecine–Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay Villejuif, France.
  • Ludovic Lacroix
    3Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle et Centre de Ressources Biologiques, AMMICA, INSERM US23/CNRS UMS3655, Gustave Roussy, France; Département de Biologie et Pathologie médicales, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; INSERM Unit U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Faculté de Médecine, Kremlin-Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Antoine Hollebecque
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Loic Verlingue
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Ecaterina Ileana
    4Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle et Centre de Ressources Biologiques, AMMICA, INSERM US23/CNRS UMS3655, Gustave Roussy, France.
  • Silvia Rosellini
    5Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Samy Ammari
    6Département de Radiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Maud Ngo-Camus
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Rastislav Bahleda
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Anas Gazzah
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Andrea Varga
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Sophie Postel-Vinay
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Yohann Loriot
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Caroline Even
    7Département de Cancérologie Cervico Faciale, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Ingrid Breuskin
    7Département de Cancérologie Cervico Faciale, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Nathalie Auger
    8Département de Biologie et Pathologie médicales, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Bastien Job
    9Plateforme de Bioinformatique, UMS AMMICA, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Thierry De Baere
    10Département de Radiologie interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Frederic Deschamps
    10Département de Radiologie interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Philippe Vielh
    11Département de Biologie et Pathologie médicales, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle et Centre de Ressources Biologiques, AMMICA, INSERM US23/CNRS UMS3655, Gustave Roussy, France.
  • Jean-Yves Scoazec
    8Département de Biologie et Pathologie médicales, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Vladimir Lazar
    12Functional Genomics Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Département de Biologie et Pathologie médicales, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Catherine Richon
    13Functional Genomics Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle et Centre de Ressources Biologiques, AMMICA, INSERM US23/CNRS UMS3655, Gustave Roussy, France.
  • Vincent Ribrag
    14Drug Development Department (DITEP), Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Eric Deutsch
    15Department of Radiation Oncology, Drug Development Department (DITEP), INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; University Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
  • Eric Angevin
    1Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Gilles Vassal
    16Direction de la Recherche Clinique, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Alexander Eggermont
    17Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Fabrice André
    18INSERM Unit U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Faculté de Médecine, Kremlin-Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Jean-Charles Soria
    19Drug Development Department (DITEP), Inserm Unit U981, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

書誌事項

公開日
2017-06-01
DOI
  • 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-16-1396
公開者
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>High-throughput genomic analyses may improve outcomes in patients with advanced cancers. MOSCATO 01 is a prospective clinical trial evaluating the clinical benefit of this approach. Nucleic acids were extracted from fresh-frozen tumor biopsies and analyzed by array comparative genomic hybridization, next-generation sequencing, and RNA sequencing. The primary objective was to evaluate clinical benefit as measured by the percentage of patients presenting progression-free survival (PFS) on matched therapy (PFS2) 1.3-fold longer than the PFS on prior therapy (PFS1). A total of 1,035 adult patients were included, and a biopsy was performed in 948. An actionable molecular alteration was identified in 411 of 843 patients with a molecular portrait. A total of 199 patients were treated with a targeted therapy matched to a genomic alteration. The PFS2/PFS1 ratio was &gt;1.3 in 33% of the patients (63/193). Objective responses were observed in 22 of 194 patients (11%; 95% CI, 7%–17%), and median overall survival was 11.9 months (95% CI, 9.5–14.3 months).</jats:p> <jats:p>Significance: This study suggests that high-throughput genomics could improve outcomes in a subset of patients with hard-to-treat cancers. Although these results are encouraging, only 7% of the successfully screened patients benefited from this approach. Randomized trials are needed to validate this hypothesis and to quantify the magnitude of benefit. Expanding drug access could increase the percentage of patients who benefit. Cancer Discov; 7(6); 586–95. ©2017 AACR.</jats:p> <jats:p>See related commentary by Schram and Hyman, p. 552.</jats:p> <jats:p>This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 539</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Cancer Discovery

    Cancer Discovery 7 (6), 586-595, 2017-06-01

    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

被引用文献 (6)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ