Application of time-lapse ERT imaging to watershed characterization

  • Carlyle R. Miller
    1Formerly Boise State University, Department of Geosciences, Boise, Idaho, U.S.A.; presently MSE Technology Applications Inc., Earth Sciences, Butte, Montana, U.S.A. E-mail: carl.miller@mse-ta.com.
  • Partha S. Routh
    2Formerly Boise State University, Department of Geosciences, Boise, Idaho, U.S.A.; presently Subsurface Technology, ConocoPhillips, Houston, Texas, U.S.A. E-mail: partha.s.routh@conocophillips.com.
  • Troy R. Brosten
    3Boise State University, Department of Geosciences, Boise, Idaho, U.S.A. E-mail: troybrosten@mail.boisestate.edu; jmcnamar@boisestate.edu.
  • James P. McNamara
    3Boise State University, Department of Geosciences, Boise, Idaho, U.S.A. E-mail: troybrosten@mail.boisestate.edu; jmcnamar@boisestate.edu.

書誌事項

公開日
2008-01-01
DOI
  • 10.1190/1.2907156
公開者
Society of Exploration Geophysicists

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has many practical applications to the study of subsurface properties and processes. When inverting time-lapse ERT data, it is useful to proceed beyond straightforward inversion of data differences and take advantage of the time-lapse nature of the data. We assess various approaches for inverting and interpreting time-lapse ERT data and determine that two approaches work well. The first approach is model subtraction after separate inversion of the data from two time periods, and the second approach is to use the inverted model from a base data set as the reference model or prior information for subsequent time periods. We prefer this second approach. Data inversion methodology should be consideredwhen designing data acquisition; i.e., to utilize the second approach, it is important to collect one or more data sets for which the bulk of the subsurface is in a background or relatively unperturbed state. A third and commonly used approach to time-lapse inversion, inverting the difference between two data sets, localizes the regions of the model in which change has occurred; however, varying noise levels between the two data sets can be problematic. To further assess the various time-lapse inversion approaches, we acquired field data from a catchment within the Dry Creek Experimental Watershed near Boise, Idaho, U.S.A. We combined the complimentary information from individual static ERT inversions, time-lapse ERT images, and available hydrologic data in a robust interpretation scheme to aid in quantifying seasonal variations in subsurface moisture content.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Geophysics

    Geophysics 73 (3), G7-G17, 2008-01-01

    Society of Exploration Geophysicists

被引用文献 (3)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ