Design, Operation, and Safety of Single‐Room Interventional MRI Suites: Practical Experience From Two Centers
-
- Mark J. White
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery Queen Square, London UK
-
- John S. Thornton
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery Queen Square, London UK
-
- David J. Hawkes
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing London UK
-
- Derek L.G. Hill
- IXICO London UK
-
- Neil Kitchen
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery Queen Square, London UK
-
- Laura Mancini
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery Queen Square, London UK
-
- Andrew W. McEvoy
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery Queen Square, London UK
-
- Reza Razavi
- Kings College London London UK
-
- Sally Wilson
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery Queen Square, London UK
-
- Tarek Yousry
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery Queen Square, London UK
-
- Stephen F. Keevil
- Kings College London London UK
Bibliographic Information
- Published
- 2014-02-04
- Rights Information
-
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
- DOI
-
- 10.1002/jmri.24577
- Publisher
- Wiley
Search this article
Description
<jats:p>The design and operation of a facility in which a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner is incorporated into a room used for surgical or endovascular cardiac interventions presents several challenges. MR safety must be maintained in the presence of a much wider variety of equipment than is found in a diagnostic unit, and of staff unfamiliar with the MRI environment, without compromising the safety and practicality of the interventional procedure. Both the MR‐guided cardiac interventional unit at Kings College London and the intraoperative imaging suite at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery are single‐room interventional facilities incorporating 1.5 T cylindrical‐bore MRI scanners. The two units employ similar strategies to maintain MR safety, both in original design and day‐to‐day operational workflows, and between them over a decade of incident‐free practice has been accumulated. This article outlines these strategies, highlighting both similarities and differences between the units, as well as some lessons learned and resulting procedural changes made in both units since installation. <jats:bold>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;41:34–43.</jats:bold> © <jats:bold>2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc</jats:bold>.</jats:p>
Journal
-
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
-
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 41 (1), 34-43, 2014-02-04
Wiley
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1362825896347149824
-
- ISSN
- 15222586
- 10531807
-
- Data Source
-
- Crossref