Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

DOI Web Site Web Site 13 Citations
  • Leslie K. John
    Marketing Unit, Harvard Business School
  • George Loewenstein
    Department of Social & Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University
  • Drazen Prelec
    Sloan School of Management and Departments of Economics and Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Search this article

Description

<jats:p> Cases of clear scientific misconduct have received significant media attention recently, but less flagrantly questionable research practices may be more prevalent and, ultimately, more damaging to the academic enterprise. Using an anonymous elicitation format supplemented by incentives for honest reporting, we surveyed over 2,000 psychologists about their involvement in questionable research practices. The impact of truth-telling incentives on self-admissions of questionable research practices was positive, and this impact was greater for practices that respondents judged to be less defensible. Combining three different estimation methods, we found that the percentage of respondents who have engaged in questionable practices was surprisingly high. This finding suggests that some questionable practices may constitute the prevailing research norm. </jats:p>

Journal

Citations (13)*help

See more

Report a problem

Back to top