- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Exploring standards for industrializing human induced pluripotent stem cells
Search this article
Description
Popular belief assumes that human pluripotent cells can now be obtained in any lab or company by induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell reprogramming. However, the difficulties in robustly producing human iPS-derived cells that are fit for drug discovery are becoming increasingly apparent. This is because we still have not come up with a strict definition of pluripotency. Our attempts at prospectively identifying differentiation-defective human iPS cells using teratoma assays or marker expression have clearly failed to date. Here, we will revisit how conventional pluripotency tests have failed in evaluating iPS cells adequately for drug discovery and emphasize two aspects of developmental transitions (what we call here a cell's chronological value and the segregation of factors as it differentiates) to elucidate inherent problems with our current understanding of human iPS cells. Finally, we challenge the field by presenting our perspective on distinguishing good human iPS cells from bad ones.
Journal
-
- Pharmaceutical Bioprocessing
-
Pharmaceutical Bioprocessing 3 (3), 199-213, 2015-06
OMICS Publishing Group
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1363107369547277568
-
- DOI
- 10.4155/pbp.15.9
-
- ISSN
- 20489153
- 20489145
-
- Data Source
-
- Crossref
- OpenAIRE