Poised to prosper? A cross‐system comparison of climate change effects on native and non‐native species performance
-
- Cascade J. B. Sorte
- Department of Environmental, Earth and Ocean Sciences University of Massachusetts Boston MA USA
-
- Ines Ibáñez
- School of Natural Resources University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
-
- Dana M. Blumenthal
- Rangeland Resources Research Unit USDA Agricultural Research Service Fort Collins CO USA
-
- Nicole A. Molinari
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology University of California Santa Barbara CA USA
-
- Luke P. Miller
- Hopkins Marine Station Stanford University Pacific Grove CA USA
-
- Edwin D. Grosholz
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy University of California Davis CA USA
-
- Jeffrey M. Diez
- Institute of Integrative Biology ETH Zurich Switzerland
-
- Carla M. D'Antonio
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology University of California Santa Barbara CA USA
-
- Julian D. Olden
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA USA
-
- Sierra J. Jones
- Department of Biological Sciences University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA
-
- Jeffrey S. Dukes
- Department of Forestry and Natural Resources and Department of Biological Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette IN USA
-
- Katharine Suding
- editor
説明
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Climate change and biological invasions are primary threats to global biodiversity that may interact in the future. To date, the hypothesis that climate change will favour non‐native species has been examined exclusively through local comparisons of single or few species. Here, we take a meta‐analytical approach to broadly evaluate whether non‐native species are poised to respond more positively than native species to future climatic conditions. We compiled a database of studies in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems that reported performance measures of non‐native (157 species) and co‐occurring native species (204 species) under different temperature, CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> and precipitation conditions. Our analyses revealed that in terrestrial (primarily plant) systems, native and non‐native species responded similarly to environmental changes. By contrast, in aquatic (primarily animal) systems, increases in temperature and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> largely inhibited native species. There was a general trend towards stronger responses among non‐native species, including enhanced positive responses to more favourable conditions and stronger negative responses to less favourable conditions. As climate change proceeds, aquatic systems may be particularly vulnerable to invasion. Across systems, there could be a higher risk of invasion at sites becoming more climatically hospitable, whereas sites shifting towards harsher conditions may become more resistant to invasions.</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Ecology Letters
-
Ecology Letters 16 (2), 261-270, 2012-10-15
Wiley