- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines
-
- M. Brindle
- Department of Surgery, Alberta Children's Hospital , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
-
- G. Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
-
- D. N. Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre , Nottingham, UK
-
- O. Ljungqvist
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University and University Hospital , Örebro, Sweden
-
- U. O. Gustafsson
- Department of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden
Description
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>ERAS® Society guidelines are holistic, multidisciplinary tools designed to improve outcomes after surgery. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach was initially developed for colorectal surgery and has been implemented successfully across a large number of settings, resulting in improved patient outcomes. As the ERAS approach is increasingly being adopted worldwide and new guidelines are being generated for new populations, there is a need to define an ERAS® Society guideline and the methodology that should be followed in its development.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>The ERAS® Society recommended approach for developing new guidelines is based on the creation of multidisciplinary guideline development groups responsible for defining topics, planning the literature search, and assessing the quality of the evidence.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Clear definitions for the elements of an ERAS guideline involve multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches impacting on multiple patient outcomes. Recommended methodology for guideline development follows a rigorous approach with systematic identification and evaluation of evidence, and consensus-based development of recommendations. Guidelines should then be evaluated and reviewed regularly to ensure that the best and most up-to-date evidence is used consistently to support surgical patients.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>There is a need for a standardized, evidence-informed approach to both the development of new ERAS® Society guidelines, and the adaptation and revision of existing guidelines.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Journal
-
- BJS Open
-
BJS Open 4 (1), 157-163, 2020-02-01
Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1363107371270035840
-
- ISSN
- 24749842
-
- Data Source
-
- Crossref