-
- Wendy G. Halpern
- Genetech, South San Francisco, California, USA
-
- Mehrdad Ameri
- GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA
-
- Christopher J. Bowman
- Pfizer, Groton, Connecticut, USA
-
- Michael R. Elwell
- Covance, Chantilly, Virginia, USA
-
- Michael L. Mirsky
- Pfizer, Groton, Connecticut, USA
-
- Julian Oliver
- Incyte, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
-
- Karen S. Regan
- Regan Path/Tox Services, Ashland, Ohio, USA
-
- Amera K. Remick
- WIL Research, a Charles River Company, Hillsborough, North Carolina, USA
-
- Vicki L. Sutherland
- NIEHS/NTP, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
-
- Kary E. Thompson
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
-
- Claudine Tremblay
- Charles River Laboratories, Senneville, Quebec, Canada
-
- Midori Yoshida
- Food Safety Commission of Japan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
-
- Lindsay Tomlinson
- Pfizer, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- Inclusion of Reproductive and Pathology End Points for Assessment of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity in Pharmaceutical Drug Development
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:p> Standard components of nonclinical toxicity testing for novel pharmaceuticals include clinical and anatomic pathology, as well as separate evaluation of effects on reproduction and development to inform clinical development and labeling. General study designs in regulatory guidances do not specifically mandate use of pathology or reproductive end points across all study types; thus, inclusion and use of these end points are variable. The Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology (STP) formed a Working Group to assess the current guidelines and practices on the use of reproductive, anatomic pathology, and clinical pathology end points in general, reproductive, and developmental toxicology studies. The Working Group constructed a survey sent to pathologists and reproductive toxicologists, and responses from participating organizations were collected through the STP for evaluation by the Working Group. The regulatory context, relevant survey results, and collective experience of the Working Group are discussed and provide the basis of each assessment by study type. Overall, the current practice of including specific end points on a case-by-case basis is considered appropriate. Points to consider are summarized for inclusion of reproductive end points in general toxicity studies and for the informed use of pathology end points in reproductive and developmental toxicity studies. </jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Toxicologic Pathology
-
Toxicologic Pathology 44 (6), 789-809, 2016-07-11
SAGE Publications