Work-Rate Affects Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Results in Heart Failure

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Aims</jats:title> <jats:p>Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is used to evaluate patients with chronic heart failure (HF) usually by means of a personalized ramp exercise protocol. Our aim was to evaluate if exercise duration or ramp rate influences the results.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods and results</jats:title> <jats:p>Ninety HF patients were studied (peak VO2: &gt;20 ml/min/kg, n=28, 15&gt;20 ml/min/kg, n=39 and &lt;15 ml/min/kg, n=23). Each patient did four CPET studies. The initial study was used to separate the subjects into three groups, according to their exercise capacity. In the remaining studies, work-rate was increased at three different rates designed to have the subjects reach peak exercise in 5, 10 and 15 min from the start of the ramp increase in work-rate, respectively. The order was randomized. The work-rate applied for the total population averaged 22.7±8.0, 11.6±3.7, 7.5±2.9 W/min with effective loaded exercise duration of 5 min and 16 s±29 s, 9 min and 43 s±49 s and 14 min and 32 s±1 min and 12 s for the 5-, 10- and 15-min tests, respectively. Peak averaged 16.9±4.3*, 18.0±4.4 and 18.0±5.4 ml/min/kg for the 5-, 10- and 15-min tests, (*=p&lt;0.001 vs. 10 min). The shortest test had the lowest peak heart rate and ventilation and highest peak work-rate. Peak and heart rate were lowest in 5-min tests regardless of HF severity. The δ/δwork-rate was lowest in 5-min tests and highest in 15-min tests. At all ramp rates, δ/δwork-rate was lower for the subjects with the lower peak . The slope and at anaerobic threshold were not affected by the protocol for any grade of HF.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>In chronic HF, exercise protocol has a small effect on peak and δ/δwork but does not affect at anaerobic threshold and slope.</jats:p> </jats:sec>