Substorm injection modeling with nondipolar, time‐dependent background field

  • Sorin Zaharia
    Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos New Mexico USA
  • J. Birn
    Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos New Mexico USA
  • R. H. W. Friedel
    Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos New Mexico USA
  • G. D. Reeves
    Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos New Mexico USA
  • M. F. Thomsen
    Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos New Mexico USA
  • C. Z. Cheng
    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton University Princeton New Jersey USA

書誌事項

公開日
2004-10
権利情報
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
DOI
  • 10.1029/2004ja010464
公開者
American Geophysical Union (AGU)

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:p>We model energetic particle injections during substorms by investigating the particle interaction with an earthward propagating electromagnetic pulse of spatially localized transient electric (<jats:bold>E</jats:bold>) and magnetic (<jats:bold>B</jats:bold>) fields, superposed over a background <jats:bold>B</jats:bold> field. The current work extends our previous model by considering the background field to be nondipolar (stretched) before the arrival of the pulse (i.e., during the substorm growth phase), changing in a time‐dependent manner into a dipole field in the wake of the pulse. The particle motion still conserves the first adiabatic invariant, even in the stretched <jats:bold>B</jats:bold> field, and both protons and electrons are convected earthward by the <jats:bold>E</jats:bold> × <jats:bold>B</jats:bold> drift to regions of higher field, undergoing betatron acceleration. As in the previous model, we find fully analytical solutions for the gyrocenter motion of the 90° pitch angle particles, and we use them to compute the injected particle flux. We discuss how the model can explain several injection features such as the low/high energy cutoffs, and finally we apply the solutions to a simulation of an actual injection event, obtaining good agreement with observations. The current results with the more realistic background field show significant increase in particle flux for “substorm energies” (tens to hundreds of keVs) compared with the case of a dipole background, leading to the conclusion that the particles have to arrive from closer to Earth than before in order to explain the observed injected flux levels. The new model provides a better fit to observations than the previous one, since it requires lower transient <jats:bold>E</jats:bold> fields (more realistic of a typical substorm), and thus better explains the ubiquity of particle injections associated with substorms.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ