Target‐site <scp>EPSPS</scp> Pro‐106 mutations: sufficient to endow glyphosate resistance in polyploid <i>Echinochloa colona</i>?

  • Heping Han
    Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Plant Biology University of Western Australia Western Australia Australia
  • Qin Yu
    Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Plant Biology University of Western Australia Western Australia Australia
  • Michael J Widderick
    Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Toowoomba Australia
  • Stephen B Powles
    Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Plant Biology University of Western Australia Western Australia Australia

書誌事項

公開日
2015-06
権利情報
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
DOI
  • 10.1002/ps.4038
公開者
Wiley

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>BACKGROUND</jats:title><jats:p>This study confirms and characterises glyphosate resistance in two polyploid <jats:italic>Echinochloa colona</jats:italic> populations from north‐eastern Australia.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title><jats:p>Glyphosate dose response revealed that the two resistant populations were marginally (up to twofold) resistant to glyphosate. Resistant plants did not differ in non‐target‐site foliar uptake and translocation of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:sup>14</jats:sup>C</jats:styled-content>‐glyphosate, but contained the known target‐site 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EPSPS</jats:styled-content>) mutation Pro‐106‐Thr and/or Pro‐106‐Leu. Although plants carrying either a single or two <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EPSPS</jats:styled-content> mutations were glyphosate resistant relative to the susceptible population, they were still controlled at the field rate of glyphosate (450 g a.e. ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) when treated under warm conditions (25/20 °C). However, when treated in hot conditions (35/30 °C), most mutant resistant plants (68%) can survive the field rate, and an increase (2.5‐fold) in glyphosate <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">LD<jats:sub>50</jats:sub></jats:styled-content> was found for both the R and S populations.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>CONCLUSIONS</jats:title><jats:p>This study shows that one or two <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EPSPS</jats:styled-content> Pro‐106 mutations are insufficient to confer field‐rate glyphosate resistance in polyploidy <jats:italic>E. colona</jats:italic> at mild temperatures. However, control of these mutant plants at the glyphosate field rate is poor at high temperatures, probably owing to reduced glyphosate efficacy. Therefore, glyphosate should be applied during relatively mild (warm) temperature periods in the summer growing season to improve <jats:italic>E. colona</jats:italic> control. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry</jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (3)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ