Energy acquisition and allocation to egg production in relation to fish reproductive strategies
-
- Richard S McBride
- National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center 166 Water Street Woods Hole MA 02543 USA
-
- Stylianos Somarakis
- Hellenic Centre for Marine Research PO Box 2214 Heraklion 71003 Crete Greece
-
- Gary R Fitzhugh
- National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center Panama City FL 32408 USA
-
- Anu Albert
- Estonian Marine Institute University of Tartu Vanemuise 46 51014 Tartu Estonia
-
- Nathalia A Yaragina
- Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography 6 Knipovich St. Murmansk 183038 Russia
-
- Mark J Wuenschel
- National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center 166 Water Street Woods Hole MA 02543 USA
-
- Alexandre Alonso‐Fernández
- Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas IIM‐CSIC c/Eduardo Cabello 6 36208 Vigo (Pontevedra) Spain
-
- Gualtiero Basilone
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto Ambiente Marino Costiero UOS Mazara (CNR‐IAMC) Via L. Vaccara no. 61 91026 Mazara del Vallo (Tp) Italy
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2013-05-20
- 権利情報
-
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
- DOI
-
- 10.1111/faf.12043
- 公開者
- Wiley
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Oogenesis in fishes follows a universal plan; yet, due to differences in the synchrony and rate of egg development, spawning frequency varies from daily to once in a lifetime. Some species spawn and feed in separate areas, during different seasons, by storing energy and drawing on it later for reproduction (i.e. capital breeding). Other species spawn using energy acquired locally, throughout a prolonged spawning season, allocating energy directly to reproduction (i.e. income breeding). Capital breeders tend to ovulate all at once and are more likely to be distributed at boreal latitudes. Income breeding allows small fish to overcome allometric constraints on egg production. Income breeders can recover more quickly when good‐feeding conditions are re‐established, which is a benefit to adults regarding bet‐hedging spawning strategies. Many species exhibit mixed capital‐ and income‐breeding patterns. An individual's position along this capital–income continuum may shift with ontogeny or in relation to environmental conditions, so breeding patterns are a conditional reproductive strategy. Poor‐feeding environments can lead to delayed maturation, skipped spawning, fewer spawning events per season or fewer eggs produced per event. In a few cases, variations in feeding environments appear to affect recruitment variability. These flexible processes of energy acquisition and allocation allow females to prioritize their own condition over their propagules' condition at any given spawning opportunity, thereby investing energy cautiously to maximize lifetime reproductive value. These findings have implications for temporal and spatial sampling designs, for measurement and interpretation of fecundity, and for interpreting fishery and ecosystem assessments.</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Fish and Fisheries
-
Fish and Fisheries 16 (1), 23-57, 2013-05-20
Wiley
