Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases

DOI Web Site 2 Citations 51 References Open Access
  • Tsunehisa Hirose
    Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Ishibashi 617-0004 17, Kaide-cho, Muko-shi, Kyoto, Japan
  • Daniel Keck
    Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Ishibashi 617-0004 17, Kaide-cho, Muko-shi, Kyoto, Japan
  • Yoshihiro Izumi
    Division of Metabolomics, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Maidashi 812-8582 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Takeshi Bamba
    Division of Metabolomics, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Maidashi 812-8582 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan

Description

<jats:p>The retention behavior of a wide variety of stationary phases was compared in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC). We also attempted to elucidate the retention behavior in SFC by investigating the selectivity of the different stationary phases. SFC separation conditions with polar stationary phases, such as silica gel (SL) and diol (Diol) phases, operate via adsorptions that include hydrophilic and ionic interactions similar to those in NP-HPLC. Moreover, non-polar stationary phases, such as pentabromophenyl (PBr), pyrenylethyl (PYE), and octadecyl (C18), could be used despite the non-polar mobile phase conditions, because the dispersion and π-π interactions were stronger in SFC than in HPLC. These results reflect the selectivity of the stationary phase and its retention factor, thus providing useful information for the selection of appropriate stationary phases for particular analytes.</jats:p>

Journal

  • Molecules

    Molecules 24 (13), 2425-, 2019-07-02

    MDPI AG

Citations (2)*help

See more

References(51)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top