-
- Katherine Püttgen
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;
-
- Anne Lucky
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio;
-
- Denise Adams
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio;
-
- Elena Pope
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
-
- Catherine McCuaig
- Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
-
- Julie Powell
- Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
-
- Dana Feigenbaum
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
-
- Yulia Savva
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland;
-
- Eulalia Baselga
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain;
-
- Kristen Holland
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin;
-
- Beth Drolet
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin;
-
- Dawn Siegel
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin;
-
- Kimberly D. Morel
- Columbia University, New York, New York;
-
- Maria C. Garzon
- Columbia University, New York, New York;
-
- Erin Mathes
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
-
- Christine Lauren
- Columbia University, New York, New York;
-
- Amy Nopper
- Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri; and
-
- Kimberly Horii
- Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri; and
-
- Brandon Newell
- Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri; and
-
- Wei Song
- Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
-
- Ilona Frieden
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2016-09-01
- DOI
-
- 10.1542/peds.2016-0355
- 公開者
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:sec> <jats:title>BACKGROUND:</jats:title> <jats:p>There has been a dramatic increase in the off-label use of ophthalmic timolol maleate, a β-blocker used for infantile hemangioma (IH) treatment as a topical counterpart to oral propranolol. Its safety and efficacy in a pediatric population with IH have not been evaluated in a large cohort. Our goal was to retrospectively assess timolol’s effectiveness, discern characteristics associated with response, and document reported adverse events.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>METHODS:</jats:title> <jats:p>A multicenter retrospective cohort study of 731 patients treated with topical timolol was completed at 9 centers. Inclusion required an IH suitable for timolol in the treating physician’s judgment and access to clinical details including photographs. Logistic regression analysis and descriptive statistics were performed. Primary outcome measures were efficacy assessed by using visual analog scales for color and for size, extent, and volume from review of digital photographs taken as standard of care.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESULTS:</jats:title> <jats:p>Most IHs were localized (80.1%) and superficial (55.3%). Risk of disfigurement was the most common indication for therapy (74.3%). Duration of therapy (P < .0001), initial thinness (P = .008), and subtype (P = .031) were significant predictors of response. Best response occurred in superficial IHs <1 mm thick. Fifty-three (7.3%) required subsequent therapy with systemic β-blocker. Adverse events were mild, occurring in 25 (3.4%) patients. No cardiovascular side effects were documented.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS:</jats:title> <jats:p>Timolol seems to be a well-tolerated, safe treatment option with moderate to good effectiveness, demonstrating best response in thin, superficial IHs regardless of pretreatment size. Timolol can be recommended as an alternative to systemic β-blockers and watchful waiting for many patients.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- Pediatrics
-
Pediatrics 138 (3), 2016-09-01
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)