Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations

  • Martin Wilson
    Centre for Human Brain Health and School of Psychology University of Birmingham Birmingham England
  • Ovidiu Andronesi
    Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts
  • Peter B. Barker
    Department of Radiology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland
  • Robert Bartha
    Robarts Research Institute University of Western Ontario London Canada
  • Alberto Bizzi
    U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milano Italy
  • Patrick J. Bolan
    Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota
  • Kevin M. Brindle
    Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge Cambridge England
  • In‐Young Choi
    Department of Neurology, Hoglund Brain Imaging Center University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City Kansas
  • Cristina Cudalbu
    Center for Biomedical Imaging Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
  • Ulrike Dydak
    School of Health Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana
  • Uzay E. Emir
    School of Health Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana
  • Ramon G. Gonzalez
    Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts
  • Stephan Gruber
    High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical imaging and Image‐Guided Therapy Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
  • Rolf Gruetter
    Laboratory for Functional and Metabolic Imaging, Center for Biomedical Imaging Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
  • Rakesh K. Gupta
    Fortis Memorial Research Institute Gurugram, Haryana India
  • Arend Heerschap
    Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands
  • Anke Henning
    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics Tuebingen Germany
  • Hoby P. Hetherington
    Department of Radiology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
  • Petra S. Huppi
    Department of Pediatrics University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
  • Ralph E. Hurd
    Stanford Radiological Sciences Lab Stanford California
  • Kejal Kantarci
    Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota
  • Risto A Kauppinen
    School of Psychological Science University of Bristol Bristol England
  • Dennis W. J. Klomp
    University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands
  • Roland Kreis
    Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland
  • Marijn J. Kruiskamp
    Philips Healthcare Best the Netherlands
  • Martin O. Leach
    CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital London England
  • Alexander P. Lin
    Center for Clinical Spectroscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard University Medical School Boston Massachusetts
  • Peter R. Luijten
    University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands
  • Małgorzata Marjańska
    Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota
  • Andrew A. Maudsley
    Department of Radiology University of Miami Miami Florida
  • Dieter J. Meyerhoff
    DVA Medical Center and Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco San Francisco California
  • Carolyn E. Mountford
    Translational Research Institute Woolloongabba Australia
  • Paul G. Mullins
    Bangor Imaging Unit, School of Psychology Bangor University Bangor Wales
  • James B. Murdoch
    Canon Medical Research USA Mayfield Village Ohio
  • Sarah J. Nelson
    Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco San Francisco California
  • Ralph Noeske
    GE Healthcare Berlin Germany
  • Gülin Öz
    Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota
  • Julie W. Pan
    Department of Neurology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
  • Andrew C. Peet
    Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham England
  • Harish Poptani
    Centre for Preclinical Imaging, Institute of Translational Medicine University of Liverpool Liverpool England
  • Stefan Posse
    Department of Neurology University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico
  • Eva‐Maria Ratai
    Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts
  • Nouha Salibi
    MR R&D, Siemens Healthineers Malvern Pennsylvania
  • Tom W. J. Scheenen
    Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands
  • Ian C. P. Smith
    Innovative Biodiagnostics Winnipeg Canada
  • Brian J. Soher
    Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina
  • Ivan Tkáč
    Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota
  • Daniel B. Vigneron
    Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco San Francisco California
  • Franklyn A. Howe
    Molecular and Clinical Sciences St George’s University of London London England

抄録

<jats:p>Proton MRS (<jats:sup>1</jats:sup>H MRS) provides noninvasive, quantitative metabolite profiles of tissue and has been shown to aid the clinical management of several brain diseases. Although most modern clinical MR scanners support MRS capabilities, routine use is largely restricted to specialized centers with good access to MR research support. Widespread adoption has been slow for several reasons, and technical challenges toward obtaining reliable good‐quality results have been identified as a contributing factor. Considerable progress has been made by the research community to address many of these challenges, and in this paper a consensus is presented on deficiencies in widely available MRS methodology and validated improvements that are currently in routine use at several clinical research institutions. In particular, the localization error for the PRESS localization sequence was found to be unacceptably high at 3 T, and use of the semi‐adiabatic localization by adiabatic selective refocusing sequence is a recommended solution. Incorporation of simulated metabolite basis sets into analysis routines is recommended for reliably capturing the full spectral detail available from short TE acquisitions. In addition, the importance of achieving a highly homogenous static magnetic field (B<jats:sub>0</jats:sub>) in the acquisition region is emphasized, and the limitations of current methods and hardware are discussed. Most recommendations require only software improvements, greatly enhancing the capabilities of clinical MRS on existing hardware. Implementation of these recommendations should strengthen current clinical applications and advance progress toward developing and validating new MRS biomarkers for clinical use.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (8)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ