A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Welfare Legitimacy

DOI Web Site 被引用文献1件

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Michel Peillon, St Patrick's College, Maynooth, Ireland

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:p> Most studies of the legitimacy of the welfare state rely on surveys measuring the level of support for social services and benefits. These surveys show that self-interest plays only a sec ondary part in shaping the pattern of support. The latter is then based on general values and, in such circumstances, it can be equated with legitimacy. The relevant literature has clearly identified those welfare programmes which re ceive a high level of support and those which do not, but it loses its clarity with regards to the reasons for various levels of support/legiti macy. This article relies on a comparative method, called Qualitative Comparative analysis (QCA) and based on Boolean algebra, to investigate the factors associated with the legitimacy of selected social programmes in five different countries (Germany, Great Britain, Ireland, Italy, Norway). </jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ