-
- María J. Blanca
- Faculty of Psychology, Department of Psychobiology and Methodology, University of Malaga, Spain
-
- Jaume Arnau
- Faculty of Psychology, Department of Behavioural Sciences Methodology, University of Barcelona, Spain
-
- Dolores López-Montiel
- Faculty of Psychology, Department of Psychobiology and Methodology, University of Malaga, Spain
-
- Roser Bono
- Faculty of Psychology, Department of Behavioural Sciences Methodology, University of Barcelona, Spain
-
- Rebecca Bendayan
- Faculty of Psychology, Department of Psychobiology and Methodology, University of Malaga, Spain
説明
<jats:p>Parametric statistics are based on the assumption of normality. Recent findings suggest that Type I error and power can be adversely affected when data are non-normal. This paper aims to assess the distributional shape of real data by examining the values of the third and fourth central moments as a measurement of skewness and kurtosis in small samples. The analysis concerned 693 distributions with a sample size ranging from 10 to 30. Measures of cognitive ability and of other psychological variables were included. The results showed that skewness ranged between −2.49 and 2.33. The values of kurtosis ranged between −1.92 and 7.41. Considering skewness and kurtosis together the results indicated that only 5.5% of distributions were close to expected values under normality. Although extreme contamination does not seem to be very frequent, the findings are consistent with previous research suggesting that normality is not the rule with real data.</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Methodology
-
Methodology 9 (2), 78-84, 2013-05-01
Hogrefe Publishing Group