Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib or Standard Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and a Performance Status of 2

  • Rogerio Lilenbaum
    From the Mount Sinai Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Oncology/Hematology Associates of Central Illinois, IL; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Boulder, CO; and Sharp Clinical Oncology Research, San Diego, CA
  • Rita Axelrod
    From the Mount Sinai Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Oncology/Hematology Associates of Central Illinois, IL; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Boulder, CO; and Sharp Clinical Oncology Research, San Diego, CA
  • Sachdev Thomas
    From the Mount Sinai Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Oncology/Hematology Associates of Central Illinois, IL; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Boulder, CO; and Sharp Clinical Oncology Research, San Diego, CA
  • Afshin Dowlati
    From the Mount Sinai Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Oncology/Hematology Associates of Central Illinois, IL; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Boulder, CO; and Sharp Clinical Oncology Research, San Diego, CA
  • Leonard Seigel
    From the Mount Sinai Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Oncology/Hematology Associates of Central Illinois, IL; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Boulder, CO; and Sharp Clinical Oncology Research, San Diego, CA
  • Donald Albert
    From the Mount Sinai Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Oncology/Hematology Associates of Central Illinois, IL; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Boulder, CO; and Sharp Clinical Oncology Research, San Diego, CA
  • Karsten Witt
    From the Mount Sinai Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Oncology/Hematology Associates of Central Illinois, IL; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Boulder, CO; and Sharp Clinical Oncology Research, San Diego, CA
  • David Botkin
    From the Mount Sinai Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Oncology/Hematology Associates of Central Illinois, IL; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Boulder, CO; and Sharp Clinical Oncology Research, San Diego, CA

抄録

<jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p> A multicenter randomized phase II trial to evaluate two treatment strategies in the first-line management of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a performance status (PS) of 2. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Patients and Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Patients were assigned to erlotinib 150 mg orally daily until progression or to carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> day 1 every 3 weeks) for up to four cycles. Patients who experienced progression or did not tolerate or refused further chemotherapy were allowed to cross over to erlotinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were response, survival, quality of life (QOL), and a retrospective molecular correlation. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to erlotinib and 51 to chemotherapy. Partial responses were 2% and 12%, respectively. Median PFS was 1.9 months in the erlotinib arm and 3.5 months in the chemotherapy arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.15; P = .06). Median survival times were 6.5 and 9.7 months, respectively (HR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.73; P = .018). Patients who crossed over to erlotinib had a median survival of 14.9 months. Sex, histology, skin rash, and smoking history predicted outcome with erlotinib. Rash and diarrhea were more common with erlotinib; emesis, alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, and fatigue were more common with chemotherapy. QOL was similar between the two arms. Molecular correlation was limited by available samples. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> Unselected patients with advanced NSCLC and PS 2 are best treated with combination chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Erlotinib may be considered in patients selected by clinical or molecular markers. </jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ