How warm was the last interglacial? New model–data comparisons

  • Bette L. Otto-Bliesner
    Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
  • Nan Rosenbloom
    Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
  • Emma J. Stone
    School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Nicholas P. McKay
    School of Earth and Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
  • Daniel J. Lunt
    School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Esther C. Brady
    Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
  • Jonathan T. Overpeck
    Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ, USA

書誌事項

公開日
2013-10-28
権利情報
  • https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/
DOI
  • 10.1098/rsta.2013.0097
公開者
The Royal Society

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:p> A Community Climate System Model, Version 3 (CCSM3) simulation for 125 ka during the Last Interglacial (LIG) is compared to two recent proxy reconstructions to evaluate surface temperature changes from modern times. The dominant forcing change from modern, the orbital forcing, modified the incoming solar insolation at the top of the atmosphere, resulting in large positive anomalies in boreal summer. Greenhouse gas concentrations are similar to those of the pre-industrial (PI) Holocene. CCSM3 simulates an enhanced seasonal cycle over the Northern Hemisphere continents with warming most developed during boreal summer. In addition, year-round warming over the North Atlantic is associated with a seasonal memory of sea ice retreat in CCSM3, which extends the effects of positive summer insolation anomalies on the high-latitude oceans to winter months. The simulated Arctic terrestrial annual warming, though, is much less than the observational evidence, suggesting either missing feedbacks in the simulation and/or interpretation of the proxies. Over Antarctica, CCSM3 cannot reproduce the large LIG warming recorded by the Antarctic ice cores, even with simulations designed to consider observed evidence of early LIG warmth in Southern Ocean and Antarctica records and the possible disintegration of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Comparisons with a HadCM3 simulation indicate that sea ice is important for understanding model polar responses. Overall, the models simulate little global annual surface temperature change, while the proxy reconstructions suggest a global annual warming at LIG (as compared to the PI Holocene) of approximately 1 <jats:sup>°</jats:sup> C, though with possible spatial sampling biases. The CCSM3 SRES B1 (low scenario) future projections suggest high-latitude warmth similar to that reconstructed for the LIG may be exceeded before the end of this century. </jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (15)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ