Venous sac embolization of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation: safety and effectiveness at mid-term follow-up

  • Kenji Kajiwara
    Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Masaki Urashima
    Department of Radiology, Hiroshima City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Takuji Yamagami
    Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Hideaki Kakizawa
    Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Noriaki Matsuura
    Department of Radiology, Hiroshima City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Akiko Matsuura
    Department of Radiology, Hiroshima City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Tae Ohnari
    Department of Radiology, Hiroshima City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Masaki Ishikawa
    Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Kazuo Awai
    Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan

Description

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> The standard technique for the transcatheter treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) involves deploying coils into the feeding arteries. We investigated whether venous sac embolization would also be a safe and useful treatment method. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p> To evaluate the safety and outcomes of venous sac embolization for PAVMs. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Material and Methods</jats:title><jats:p> This study included 15 consecutive patients (1 man, 14 women; mean age, 54 years; range, 22–76 years) with 50 PAVMs who underwent 26 procedures; four had a history of earlier cerebral infarction or exertional dyspnea. We first placed 0.018-inch interlocking detachable and/or 0.018-inch or 0.010-inch Guglielmi detachable coils to prevent systemic migration from the venous sac. We then packed the sac as tightly as possible and embolized the orifice at the proximal feeding artery. We used angiographic, clinical, and computed tomography (CT) studies to evaluate the treatment outcomes and safety of these procedures. The mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 3–63 months) in 12 patients with 43 PAVMs; three patients (7 PAVMs) were lost to follow-up. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Immediate post-embolization angiography confirmed complete primary occlusion in 47 of 50 lesions (94%). Minor complications arose in two of 26 procedures (7.7%); they were abnormal electrocardiograms without symptoms during and pleurisy immediately after the procedure. During follow-up, 40 PAVMs were free of CT evidence of reperfusion. The mean partial arterial oxygen pressure increased from 75.3% ± 13.6 before embolization to 85.4% ± 16.3 after embolization ( P < 0.01, t-test). Of the 12 patients who were available for follow-up, none experienced new-onset paradoxical embolization; pre-treatment exertional dyspnea was alleviated in one patient. There were no major complications. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> Venous sac embolization for PAVMs might be safe and more effective with no reperfusion than the standard pulmonary arterial embolization. </jats:p></jats:sec>

Journal

  • Acta Radiologica

    Acta Radiologica 55 (9), 1093-1098, 2014-11

    SAGE Publications

Citations (5)*help

See more

Report a problem

Back to top