Profiling thermal pain using quantitative sensory testing in patients with trigeminal nerve injury

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To investigate the thermal pain phenotypes using QST in patients with unilateral trigeminal nerve injury and to explore whether these different thermal pain phenotypes are associated with clinical and psychophysical characteristics.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This retrospective study included 84 patients diagnosed with posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy involving inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerve (LN). Data on clinical characteristics, subjective symptoms including hypoesthesia, dysesthesia, and allodynia, and objective signs using thermal QST were collected and explored.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Three heat (heat hypoalgesia, heat hyperalgesia, and within normal range) and cold pain phenotypes (cold hypoalgesia, cold hyperalgesia, and within normal ranges) were identified, respectively. Thermal hypoalgesia was more frequently observed than thermal hyperalgesia. Heat hypoalgesia regardless of cold pain abnormalities appears to be associated with subjective negative symptoms, while thermal hyperalgesia seems to have little relationship with negative and positive symptoms. Thermal pain phenotypes were associated with loss of innocuous thermal sensation. Unlike heat pain phenotypes, cold pain phenotypes differed between IAN injury and LN injury.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>The thermal pain phenotypes identified in this study seem to be related to clinical and psychophysical findings differently. These results would be a good starting point for assessing posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy and interpreting the thermal QST results.</jats:p></jats:sec>