Research Networks of Pharmaceutical R&D : A Case Study in Tsukuba Science City

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 医薬品産業研究開発機関の研究交流ネットワーク : 筑波研究学園都市を事例に
  • イヤクヒン サンギョウ ケンキュウ カイハツ キカン ノ ケンキュウ コウリュウ ネットワーク ツクバ ケンキュウ ガクエン トシ オ ジレイ ニ

Search this article

Abstract

Innovation is considered to be a crucial factor for corporate activities. A growing interest in the geographical dimension of innovation has been apparent in economic geography theory. In discussions about agglomeration, geographical proximity between various actors is said to promote innovation because geographical proximity accelerates the transfer of knowledge, and that is important to innovation. But some articles in the literature point out that geographical proximity is not necessary to promote innovation. This paper assesses the research networks between companies and scientists in Tsukuba Science City (Tsukuba) and clarifies the examination of whether geographical proximity is important to promoting innovation. These analyses are based on an interview and on a questionnaire survey mailed to R&D laboratories and one mailed to members of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan (Nihon Yakugakkai) in Tsukuba. The results can be summarized as follows. The reason that a private R&D center is located in Tsukuba is that they sought a relationship with a national R&D center. However, collaborative research was not promoted between the private and national R&D centers because the 'organizational proximity' was short. It is derived from the differences in the way the members of these R&D centers think. A private R&D center pursues the interests of economic performance whereas a national R&D center pursues the ideal of academic achievement. Members of a research support agency in Tsukuba fail to understand the R&D needs, so they do not play an important role in promoting research networks. When successful innovation is done, the intra-firm environment is more important than the interfirm environment because of the internal labor market and lifetime employment system that had developed in Japan. In particular, major firms have a high level of R&D expenditures, so they do not need a relationship with other firms to seek the seeds for innovation. Above all, research networks do not always grow in the local milieu. We therefore conclude that innovation does not necessarily need to be promoted based on geographical proximity.

Journal

  • GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES

    GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES 61 (2), 63-80, 2006

    THE JAPANESE SOCIETY FOR GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES

References(35)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top