Assessments by HR and %HRR of Occupational Work Exertion for Alternating Periods of Rest and Manual Labor

DOI Web Site Web Site Web Site PubMed 31 References Open Access
  • Eguchi Yasumasa
    Department of Health Development, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
  • Kawanami Shoko
    Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
  • Horie Seichi
    Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
  • Yamato Hiroshi
    Department of Health Development, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan

Search this article

Description

Objectives: Metabolic equivalents (METs) and relative metabolic rate (RMR) as calculated by oxygen uptake (VO2) are often used to assess physical exertion. In practice, accurate measurements of VO2 are difficult; heart rate (HR) values represent an alternate index of physical exertion. We investigated whether one can assess physical exertion based on HR in the workplace, even if the physical task in question involves alternating periods of strenuous anaerobic activity and rest. We also examined the potential usefulness of assessments based on percentage of heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percentage of oxygen uptake reserve (% VO2R). Methods: Six healthy men were asked to perform several physical movements. HR and VO2 were recorded in real time. Results: HR and VO2 are significantly correlated even under conditions of various repeated intermittent movements including anaerobic exertion. Cumulative fatigue results in inadequate recovery in various parameters indicating sufficient rest times, whereas VO2 values recover immediately. One movement may generate large differences in HR among individuals, but not in VO2. We found no significant differences between dispersion for %HRR and VO2R. However, as with HR, %HRR values indicated insufficient recovery after strenuous exertion. Conclusions: VO2 alone does not adequately reflect the exertion entailed by certain physical activities. HR is more useful than VO2 in evaluating the exertion required by physical labor in individual workers. While we can use %HRR and % VO2R to compare physical exertion from individual to individual, %HRR is more valuable, since % VO2R can underestimate physical exertion in recovery periods for the same reasons as VO2.<br>

Journal

References(31)*help

See more

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top