書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- FOCUS ON THE MEANING AND ISSUES OF TDR INSTITUTION FOR HISTORICAL DISTRICTS
- 歴史的街区における容積移転制度の導入の意義と課題の解明 : 台北市における容積移転諸制度の運用に関する研究(その2)
- レキシテキガイク ニ オケル ヨウセキ イテン セイド ノ ドウニュウ ノ イギ ト カダイ ノ カイメイ : タイホクシ ニ オケル ヨウセキ イテン ショ セイド ノ ウンヨウ ニ カンスル ケンキュウ(ソノ 2)
- 台北市における容積移転諸制度の運用に関する研究 その2
- Study on the Utilization of TDR institution in Taipei city (Part2)
この論文をさがす
説明
“Transfer of development right (TDR)” has been considered as an important institution for the urban regeneration since recently. The TDR system is first released in 1990 in Taipei city. Today, there are many TDR institutions in Taipei, Taiwan. The important point is that all of them could be utilized overall the Taipei city, so the integrity between TDR and existing urban plan is important.<br> We focus on the TDR institution for conservation of historical district in Dihua Street (DS), Taipei city, Taiwan. Previous studies have revealed the basic system and its historical background of the establishment of this institution. This study focuses on the analysis of the characteristic of sending site as well as receiving site of DS-TDR form the view of urban plan. Besides, we also analyze the meaning of the latest detail plan (revised) which is released Jun. 2016.<br> We estimate the achievement of DS-TDR from both the view of sending site and receiving site based on the latest data. We consider that bias of the amount of receiving site exists, most receiving sites are located in Zhongshan district. What' more, although Datong district is also designated as the priority area for receiving site, there are only few cases as a matter of fact. The integrity between DS-TDR and existing urban plan is secured by the double-deliberation system of Taipei city urban regeneration committee and Taipei city urban design committee, TDR can still give impact to the nearby environment of receiving site. It will be a solution to integrate DS-TDR into the new type of urban plan TDR: Floor area bank. Actually, it is proposed as an article in the latest detail plan (revised) in 2016, however the residents of Dihua Street are still fighting against that. Based on our estimation of macro level about the integrity between urban plan and DS-TDR, we consider that the preservation is successful from the view point of sending site. On the other hand, the achievement of designated receiving site is not effective from the view point of receiving site.<br> Besides, we consider although the preservation is successful and those historical building is now revitalized as community space, a huge amount is provided as the reward for it based on our estimation of micro level about the integrity between urban plan and DS-TDR.
収録刊行物
-
- 日本建築学会計画系論文集
-
日本建築学会計画系論文集 82 (742), 3147-3157, 2017
日本建築学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001204785094656
-
- NII論文ID
- 130006295009
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN10438548
-
- ISSN
- 18818161
- 13404210
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 028692783
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDLサーチ
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- OpenAIRE
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可
