A STUDY ON IDENTIFICATION OF HUMAN URINARY STAINS BY THE URIC ACID/UREA NITROGEN QUOTIENT
-
- TAKAHASHI Yoshiharu
- Department of Legal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine
-
- SATO Keizo
- Department of Legal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine
-
- FUJISHIRO Masaya
- Department of Legal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine
-
- KATO Akihito
- Department of Legal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine
-
- MURAGUCHI Kimino
- Department of Legal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine
-
- HTAY Hla Hla
- Department of Legal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine
-
- SATO Emiko
- Department of Legal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine
-
- TSUTSUMI Hajime
- Department of Legal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine
-
- LEE Xiao-Pen
- Department of Legal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine
-
- KATSUMATA Yoshinao
- Nagoya Isen
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 尿酸/尿素窒素比を指標とするヒト尿斑証明法の検討
- 尿酸/尿素窒素比を指標とするヒト尿斑証明法の検討(3)尿酸吸収極大の減少率を指標とするウリカーゼ法との比較
- ニョウサン ニョウソ チッソヒ オ シヒョウ ト スル ヒト ニョウ ハン ショウメイホウ ノ ケントウ 3 ニョウサン キュウシュウ キョクダイ ノ ゲンショウリツ オ シヒョウ ト スル ウリカーゼホウ ト ノ ヒカク
- III. COMPARISON OF THE QUOTIENT METHOD AND THE URICASE METHOD
- III.尿酸吸収極大の減少率を指標とするウリカーゼ法との比較
Search this article
Description
Humans and great apes do not possess urate oxidase (uricase); hence, uric acid (UA) is the main end product of purine metabolism in these species. Based on the facts described above, the uricase method utilizing the decrease rate of absorbance at a maximum of 293nm for UA has been widely used in the forensic laboratory. However, Dalmatians excrete a large amount of UA because the reuptake of UA in urinary tubules is disturbed. Fecal stains of birds usually contain a large amount of UA since it is their final product of protein metabolism. Therefore, the uricase method may not be reliable for identification of human urinary stains. We have reported a practical method for identification of human urinary stains by the UA/urea nitrogen (UN) quotient; UN was chosen as an indicator of concentration of urinary components because it is the universal end product of protein metabolism in all mammals. In this study, our method was compared with the uricase method by analyzing urinary stains obtained from 60 different humans, 14 species of non-human primates, 11 species of mammals and 31 different kinds of dogs along with fecal stains from 6 different birds. With the uricase method, urinary stains obtained from three kinds of dogs including Dalmatians, chimpanzees, tufted capuchin monkeys, cotton-headed tamarins, guinea pigs and cattle as well as fecal stains of birds could not be differentiated from human urinary stains. Conversely, not only urinary stains from all mammals except for Dalmatians and chimpanzees but also fecal stains of birds could be differentiated from human urinary stains with our method. From the results obtained, our quotient UA/UN method was proved to be useful in forensic science practice.
Journal
-
- Journal of The Showa Medical Association
-
Journal of The Showa Medical Association 69 (5), 395-404, 2009
The Showa University Society
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001204840280320
-
- NII Article ID
- 130000852991
-
- NII Book ID
- AN00117027
-
- ISSN
- 21850976
- 00374342
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 10640745
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Article Type
- journal article
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL Search
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed