- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Changes in the Evaluation Scores on “The Questionnaire for Hearing 2002” after Hearing Aid Fitting―Study of cases with mild and moderate hearing loss―
-
- Suzuki Keiko
- Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences
-
- Okamoto Makito
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine
-
- Suzuki Makihiko
- Kitasato University College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
-
- Sano Hajime
- Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences
-
- Hara Yuki
- Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences
-
- Inoue Rie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University Hospital
-
- Umehara Sachie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University Hospital
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 『きこえについての質問紙2002』の評価点に表れた補聴後の変化
- Changes in the evaluation scores on “The Questionnaire for Hearing 2002” after hearing aid fitting—Study of cases with mild and moderate hearing loss
- ―軽中等度難聴例に関する検討―
Search this article
Description
<p>Objectives: In this study, to obtain basic data for clinical use of the evaluation scores on “The Questionnaire on Hearing 2002”, the changes in the scores recorded after hearing-aid fitting were examined.</p><p>Subjects: One hundred and sixty-three persons with mild or moderate hearing loss (69 men, 94 women; mean age, 64 y 5 m±15 y 8 m).</p><p>Methods: The evaluation scores recorded prior to and after hearing-aid fitting were compared retrospectively.</p><p>Results: Concerning the distribution of the evaluation scores, there was no significant differences among the 6 subscales prior to the hearing-aid fitting. After hearing-aid fitting, the evaluation scores were distributed as follows; on the 3 subscales of hearing disability, 80% showed a score of 1 or 2, on the 2 subscales of psychosocial effects, more than half showed a score of 1 or 2, and on the subscale of communication strategy, there was no change from the distribution prior to hearing-aid fitting.</p><p>Discussion: After hearing-aid fitting, the distribution of the evaluation scores showed different patterns among the subscales. This result suggests rehabilitative issues left even after hearing-aid fitting. Clinically, the profile drawn through linking the evalution scores on the 6 subscales serves as a visual indicator about the next issue that needs to be resolved.</p>
Journal
-
- AUDIOLOGY JAPAN
-
AUDIOLOGY JAPAN 60 (6), 492-499, 2017
Japan Audiological Society
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001204844481152
-
- NII Article ID
- 130006489410
-
- ISSN
- 18837301
- 03038106
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Article Type
- journal article
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
- OpenAIRE
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed