Changes in the Evaluation Scores on “The Questionnaire for Hearing 2002” after Hearing Aid Fitting―Study of cases with mild and moderate hearing loss―
-
- Suzuki Keiko
- Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences
-
- Okamoto Makito
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine
-
- Suzuki Makihiko
- Kitasato University College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
-
- Sano Hajime
- Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences
-
- Hara Yuki
- Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences
-
- Inoue Rie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University Hospital
-
- Umehara Sachie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University Hospital
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 『きこえについての質問紙2002』の評価点に表れた補聴後の変化
- Changes in the evaluation scores on “The Questionnaire for Hearing 2002” after hearing aid fitting—Study of cases with mild and moderate hearing loss
- ―軽中等度難聴例に関する検討―
Search this article
Abstract
<p>Objectives: In this study, to obtain basic data for clinical use of the evaluation scores on “The Questionnaire on Hearing 2002”, the changes in the scores recorded after hearing-aid fitting were examined.</p><p>Subjects: One hundred and sixty-three persons with mild or moderate hearing loss (69 men, 94 women; mean age, 64 y 5 m±15 y 8 m).</p><p>Methods: The evaluation scores recorded prior to and after hearing-aid fitting were compared retrospectively.</p><p>Results: Concerning the distribution of the evaluation scores, there was no significant differences among the 6 subscales prior to the hearing-aid fitting. After hearing-aid fitting, the evaluation scores were distributed as follows; on the 3 subscales of hearing disability, 80% showed a score of 1 or 2, on the 2 subscales of psychosocial effects, more than half showed a score of 1 or 2, and on the subscale of communication strategy, there was no change from the distribution prior to hearing-aid fitting.</p><p>Discussion: After hearing-aid fitting, the distribution of the evaluation scores showed different patterns among the subscales. This result suggests rehabilitative issues left even after hearing-aid fitting. Clinically, the profile drawn through linking the evalution scores on the 6 subscales serves as a visual indicator about the next issue that needs to be resolved.</p>
Journal
-
- AUDIOLOGY JAPAN
-
AUDIOLOGY JAPAN 60 (6), 492-499, 2017
Japan Audiological Society
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001204844481152
-
- NII Article ID
- 130006489410
-
- ISSN
- 18837301
- 03038106
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed