-
- 野矢 茂樹
- 東京大学
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- シュクメイロン ニ ツイテ
Search this article
Abstract
Fatalism or logical determinism says that the future is determined on a very logical ground. In this paper, examining the fatalist argument critically, I am going to show how we can avoid the fatalist thesis. Aristotle discussed this problem and came to the conclusion that some statements about the future are neither true nor false. Following his suggestion, I farther claim that the future does not exist. That is the reason why any proper name included in a statement about the future has no referent. Therefore, as Aristotle said, statements about the future have no truth value. In the latter half of this paper, I will consider some problems with my claim what does a statement about the future mean and how is the past related to the present?
Journal
-
- Kagaku tetsugaku
-
Kagaku tetsugaku 37 (2), 47-58, 2004
The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205083617024
-
- NII Article ID
- 130003640601
-
- NII Book ID
- AN00037482
-
- ISSN
- 18836461
- 02893428
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 7255588
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed