Prognosis of Myocardial Infarction With Left Ventricular Dysfunction in the Coronary Revascularization Era : Subanalysis of the Japanese Coronary Artery Disease (JCAD) Study
-
- Kuga Keisuke
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
-
- Yamasaki Hiro
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
-
- Hattori Ai
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
-
- Xu Dong-Zhu
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
-
- Watanabe Shigeyuki
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
-
- Arimoto Takanori
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Nephrology, Yamagata University School of Medicine
-
- Aonuma Kazutaka
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
-
- Kohro Takahide
- Support Center for Clinical Investigation, Jichi Medical University
-
- Yamazaki Tsutomu
- Clinical Research Support Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital
-
- Nagai Ryozo
- Jichi Medical University
書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- Prognosis of Myocardial Infarction With Left Ventricular Dysfunction in the Coronary Revascularization Era
- Do Japanese Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Left Ventricular Dysfunction Require Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation?
- – Subanalysis of the Japanese Coronary Artery Disease (JCAD) Study –
この論文をさがす
説明
Background:Indications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for patients with an old myocardial infarction (OMI) and left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) were expanded in Western countries after the results of MADIT II. However, the prognosis of OMI patients with LVD and the merits of prophylactic implantation of ICD, based on evidence in Japan, have not yet been clarified. This subanalysis of the Japanese Coronary Artery Disease (JCAD) Study focused on MADIT II-compatible patients to clarify the prognosis of OMI patients with LVD in Japan.Methods and Results:Consecutive 6,868 OMI patients were prospectively followed up for 3 years or until clinical events occurred. 291 patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30%. Clinical events, congestive heart failure, cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival and vascular events were significantly more frequent in patients with LVEF ≤30% than in those with better LVEF. In the LVEF ≤30% group, cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival comprised 33% of all-cause deaths, and the survival curves at 2 years of the LVEF ≤30% group were almost compatible with those of the MADIT II ICD group.Conclusions:In this subanalysis, LVD was less frequent than in Western countries. The annual death rate in JCAD was better than for the MADIT II ICD group. The prophylactic use of ICD seemed to be less effective than in Western countries but still expected to be useful for OMI patients with LVD in Japan. (Circ J 2014; 78: 2483–2491)
収録刊行物
-
- Circulation Journal
-
Circulation Journal 78 (10), 2483-2491, 2014
一般社団法人 日本循環器学会
- Tweet
キーワード
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205106208256
-
- NII論文ID
- 130004677644
- 130004687299
-
- NII書誌ID
- AA11591968
-
- COI
- 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2M%2Fjs1ChsA%3D%3D
-
- ISSN
- 13474820
- 13469843
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 025798117
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDLサーチ
- Crossref
- PubMed
- CiNii Articles
- OpenAIRE
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可