Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure Using Echocardiography in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
-
- Kasai Hajime
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University
-
- Matsumura Akane
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University
-
- Sugiura Toshihiko
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University
-
- Shigeta Ayako
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University
-
- Tanabe Nobuhiro
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University Department of Advanced Medicine in Pulmonary Hypertension, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University
-
- Yamamoto Keiko
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University
-
- Miwa Hideki
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University
-
- Ema Ryogo
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University
-
- Sakao Seiichiro
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University
-
- Tatsumi Koichiro
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University
この論文をさがす
説明
Background:Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) is an important pulmonary hemodynamic parameter used in the management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We compared echocardiography-derived estimates of MPAP with right heart catheterization (RHC) to identify reliable noninvasive methods of estimating MPAP-derived RHC (MPAPRHC) in these patients.Methods and Results:Echocardiography and RHC were performed in 56 patients with CTEPH (60.5±12.0 years; 44 females). We measured the tricuspid regurgitation (TR) pressure gradient (TRPG) using echocardiography. The mean systolic right ventricular (RV)-right atrial (RA) gradient was calculated by tracing the TR time velocity flow. Systolic and mean pulmonary artery pressures (SPAPTRand MPAPTR) estimated from TRPG and mean systolic RV-RA gradient were calculated by adding RA pressure based on the inferior vena cava. MPAPChemlawas calculated using Chemla’s formula: 0.61×SPAPTR+2 mmHg. MPAPRHCand pulmonary vascular resistance were 35.9±11.3 mmHg and 6.6±3.6 Wood units, respectively. The mean difference from MPAPRHCand limits of agreement were −1.5 mmHg and −19.6 to 16.5 mmHg for MPAPTR, and −4.6 mmHg and −24.5 to 15.2 mmHg for MPAPChemla. Accuracy within 10 mmHg and 5 mmHg of MPAPRHCwas 80.4% and 46.4% for MPAPTR, and 71.4% and 48.2% for MPAPChemla, respectively.Conclusions:MPAPTRand MPAPChemlaare reliable estimates for MPAPRHCin patients with CTEPH. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1259–1264)
収録刊行物
-
- Circulation Journal
-
Circulation Journal 80 (5), 1259-1264, 2016
一般社団法人 日本循環器学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205107300096
-
- NII論文ID
- 130005147668
-
- NII書誌ID
- AA11591968
-
- ISSN
- 13474820
- 13469843
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 027270085
-
- PubMed
- 26973087
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- Crossref
- PubMed
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可