原子力安全協定をめぐる一考察

  • 菅原 慎悦
    東京大学大学院 工学系研究科原子力国際専攻 日本学術振興会特別研究員 DC
  • 田邉 朋行
    (財)電力中央研究所 社会経済研究所
  • 木村 浩
    東京大学大学院 工学系研究科原子力専攻

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • A Study on the Nuclear Safety Agreements
  • ゲンシリョク アンゼン キョウテイ オ メグル イチ コウサツ コウガイ ボウシ キョウテイ ト ノ ヒカク オ ツウジテ
  • Compared with the Pollution Control Agreements
  • 公害防止協定との比較を通じて

この論文をさがす

抄録

  In this paper, we made a comparison of application between nuclear safety agreements and pollution control agreements, and considered how to improve the way of applying the former. In order to comprehend the actual status of pollution control agreements, we conducted some hearings with the Chiba Prefecture and the Chiba City because there have been few empirical studies on the application of pollution control agreements. Based on these hearings, we found it a characteristic point of pollution control agreement that quantitative standards for emission function are the main criteria of application which local governments and utilities establish through negotiations. In contrast, the ways of applying nuclear safety agreements are often ambiguous because there are no clear criteria. This comparison suggests that the stakeholders around nuclear safety agreements discuss and agree to set out concrete standards of application of nuclear safety agreements as well as pollution control agreements. However, such a difference between the two could be an indication of the difficulty to create a consensus among stakeholders in the case of nuclear safety agreement given the historical context and the differences of risk characteristics. In that case, it can be found useful for risk governance that one introduce the idea of participatory risk management to the application of nuclear safety agreements.<br>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (36)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ