Not all the good papers are accepted

DOI 1 Citations
  • Asao Takeshi
    Nara Women's University Graduate School of Hum anities and Sciences

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • “良い”論文というものは査読つき学会誌に掲載されるものなのだろうか？

Search this article

Description

In natural sciences, almost all the papers not accepted by the referees of academ ic journals can besupposed to be worthless. But in social (or cultural) sciences, the evaluation of the papers issom ew hat more com plicated. Generally, the judgem ents of papers consist of a double process. Thefirst phase is recognition of discipline it attributes. Judgem ent of contents of the research is thesecond. The two phases of the process cause twofold difficulties in acceptance of the papers that arearound boundary areas of different disciplines. Such papers could be simply rejected because oftheir mism atch to the discipline. Otherwise, they are easily m isunderstood by referees notacquainted with the contents. W e must recognize that so m any papers rejected in the current peer review system are rich in contents and worth reading.

Journal

Citations (1)*help

See more

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390001205219572608
  • NII Article ID
    130000135209
  • DOI
    10.11341/kokoro.4.62
  • ISSN
    13496905
  • Text Lang
    ja
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
    • CiNii Articles
    • Crossref
  • Abstract License Flag
    Disallowed

Report a problem

Back to top