経鼻内視鏡および通常径内視鏡を用いた胃がん検診成績

  • 吉村 理江
    医療法人財団博愛会人間ドックセンターウェルネス
  • 志賀 典子
    医療法人財団博愛会人間ドックセンターウェルネス
  • 吉村 大輔
    九州大学大学院病態制御内科
  • 渋谷 克彦
    医療法人財団博愛会人間ドックセンターウェルネス
  • 鈴木 静
    医療法人財団博愛会人間ドックセンターウェルネス
  • 吉本 雅彦
    医療法人財団博愛会人間ドックセンターウェルネス
  • 橋本 俊彦
    医療法人財団博愛会人間ドックセンターウェルネス
  • 那須 繁
    医療法人財団博愛会人間ドックセンターウェルネス
  • 中村 和彦
    九州大学大学院病態制御内科

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Single-center Sudy on Gastric Cancer Screening with Transnasal Ultrathin Endoscopy Compared to that with Transoral Regular-sized Endoscopy
  • ケイ ビ ナイシキョウ オヨビ ツウジョウ ケイ ナイシキョウ オ モチイタ イ ガン ケンシン セイセキ

この論文をさがす

抄録

Objective: To qualify gastric cancer screening with ultrathin transnasal endoscopy in our facility. <br>Methods: We compared the detection rate of gastric cancer by transnasal endoscopy to that using regular-sized endoscopy. We examined 12,021 and 9,819 male health check-up subjects by transnasal ultrathin endoscopy and regular-sized endoscopy, respectively, from April 1995 to March 2011.<br>Results: Gastric cancer was detected in 34 subjects in the transnasal endoscopy group, and the detection rate was 0.28%. The results were not inferior to those for the regular-sized oral endoscopy group (31 subjects and 0.32%). The clinicopathological findings for the cancer cases indicated an early cancer rate of 85.3% in the transnasal endoscopy group, and 38.2% of the cancer cases were treated by endoscopic resection. These results were not significantly different from those for the regular-sized endoscopy group. In the transnasal endoscopy group, lesions located at the U regions were more frequent than in the regular-sized endoscopy group, and those of less than 20 mm in diameter were also more frequent. <br>Conclusion: These results show that transnasal endoscopy is not inferior to regular-sized endoscopy for gastric cancer screening. For further investigation, we need to conduct a multi-center prospective study using a standardized observation method.

収録刊行物

参考文献 (16)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ