- 【Updated on January 20, 2026】 Integration of CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on November 26, 2025】Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
- Incorporated Jxiv preprints from JaLC and adding coverage from NDL Search
Effectivity of the weighted average method for analysis of respiratory movements in the concealed information test
-
- Tsuneoka Michiko
- National Research Institute of Police Science
-
- Matsuda Izumi
- National Research Institute of Police Science
-
- Ogawa and Tokihiro
- National Research Institute of Police Science
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 隠匿情報検査の呼吸解析における重み付き平均法の有効性
- イントク ジョウホウ ケンサ ノ コキュウ カイセキ ニ オケル オモミズキ ヘイキンホウ ノ ユウコウセイ
- Published
- 2016
- DOI
-
- 10.3408/jafst.702
- Publisher
- Japanese Association of Forensic Science and Technology
Search this article
Description
Respiratory movement is one of the indices for the concealed information test (CIT). This study examined incremental validity of the weighted average method (Matsuda & Ogawa, 2011) to analyze respiration speed (RS), respiration amplitude (RA), and respiration rate (RR). A simple average method of RS is known to be biased by analysis interval. But using the weighted average method can avoid this problem. In addition, it indicated higher detection efficiency of memorized participants compared to the simple average method. With examining time-series data, RS and RR could distinguish two groups in all 20 seconds, but RA could distinguish only in the first 10 seconds. Comparing distinguishability between 10-second average and 20-second average, RS and RR were better in 20 seconds than in 10 seconds, but RA was better in 10 seconds than in 20 seconds. This study showed that the best analysis interval for the weighted average method is different from each of respiration indexes.<br>
Journal
-
- Japanese Journal of Forensic Science and Technology
-
Japanese Journal of Forensic Science and Technology 21 (1), 87-94, 2016
Japanese Association of Forensic Science and Technology