Formation of research strategy and synthetic research evaluation based on the strategy

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 研究戦略の形成とそれに基づいた構成的な研究評価―創造的営みとしての研究プログラム評価にむけて―
  • ケンキュウ センリャク ノ ケイセイ ト ソレニ モトズイタ コウセイテキ ナ ケンキュウ ヒョウカ ソウゾウテキ イトナミ ト シテ ノ ケンキュウ プログラム ヒョウカ ニ ムケテ
  • - Toward research program evaluation as a creative activity -
  • —創造的営みとしての研究プログラム評価にむけて—

Search this article

Description

Formation of research strategy, and synthetic research evaluation based on the proposed strategy have been considered. The importance of a setup of targets and a scenario of the research program to achieve the targets as a part of strategy formation, and the importance of research evaluation consistent with the research strategy are emphasized. Research evaluation should be performed in three aspects — the research progress, the research depth and the research phase. In the individual evaluation aspect, comparison of the research performance with the research strategy framework is essential and synthetic evaluation appropriately composed of deductive inference, inductive inference and abductive inference is recommended. To make the final integrated evaluation, the synthetic method is very crucial. Examples of research unit evaluation at AIST, and the research strategy formation and evaluation of public research organizations in Nagasaki prefecture are compared with the synthetic evaluation method. The method is thought to be a creative activity that can contribute to extract the value of research and accelerate the future evolution of research programs.

Journal

  • Synthesiology

    Synthesiology 4 (1), 11-25, 2011

    National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology

Citations (1)*help

See more

References(1)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top