Results of Tailored CAS in Patients with High Risk Carotid Stenosis for CEA

DOI Web Site Web Site 被引用文献1件 参考文献16件
  • Wajima Daisuke
    Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka,Japan
  • Yonezawa Taiji
    Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka,Japan
  • Kotsugi Masashi
    Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka,Japan
  • Aketa Shuta
    Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka,Japan

この論文をさがす

説明

Obejctive: This retrospective study aimed to compare the perioperative complications associated with treating carotid artery stenosis using either carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) that were performed at a single Japanese institution from April 2011 to December 2014.Methods: CEA or CAS was selected to treat 222 lesions based on the patients’ individual risk factors. CEA was considered to be the first-line treatment in all cases (n = 104). The CEA group contained 55 symptomatic cases and 49 asymptomatic cases, and the CAS group contained 59 symptomatic cases and 59 asymptomatic cases. High-risk patients for CEA, which included, for example, those with angiographically poor collateral flows underwent CAS (n = 118).Results: The CEA and CAS groups were compared with respect to the perioperative clinical complications that occurred within 30 days of the procedures, which included any strokes, myocardial infarctions, or deaths. No significant differences were observed between the groups in relation to the perioperative complications.Conclusion: Selecting appropriate individualized treatment methods based on patients’ risk factors may contribute to improvements in the overall outcomes in patients with carotid artery stenoses.

収録刊行物

  • 脳神経血管内治療

    脳神経血管内治療 10 (1), 13-18, 2016

    特定非営利活動法人 日本脳神経血管内治療学会

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (16)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ