Position of Mountainous Area Issues on the Process of Policy Making and the Implementation of "Forest and Forestry Revitalization Plan"(Feature Articles for the Symposium,Address for the Symposium in March 28, 2013)

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 「森林・林業再生プラン」の政策形成・実行段階における山村の位置づけ(テーマ:新政策の狙いと限界,2013年春季大会)
  • 2013年春季大会論文 「森林・林業再生プラン」の政策形成・実行段階における山村の位置づけ
  • 2013ネン シュンキ タイカイ ロンブン 「 シンリン ・ リンギョウ サイセイ プラン 」 ノ セイサク ケイセイ ・ ジッコウ ダンカイ ニ オケル サンソン ノ イチズケ

Search this article

Description

This study aimed to examine the policy-making and implementation process of "revitalization plan of forest and forestry" from a perspective of rural development. It was pointed out that the final report in July, 2010, positioned mountainous areas only as a place for job creation and didn't consider the presence of family-owned business in forestry. Meanwhile, 2010 World Agriculture and Forestry Census analyzed that family-owned business had expanded timber production approximately to the share of 30% in 2010. Ninety percent of the production was produced by family-owned business owned less than 100 ha. Accordingly, it was pointed out that the Forest Management Plan and "forest management and environmental conservation direct payment system" are strong structural reform policies and incentive for wood production. Finally, we carried out case studies of the Forest Management Plan in the implementation process. We argued that forest actors of forest and forestry management vary from community to community, so who are to be the policy makers is the issue to be left to the discretion of local governments, not to be decided across the board by the nation.

Journal

Citations (1)*help

See more

References(38)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top