核実験問題と日米関係-「教育」過程の生成と崩壊を中心に-

DOI Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • How to Embrace the Bomb: Nuclear Testing and U. S. -Japan Relations, 1954-1957
  • カク ジッケン モンダイ ト ニチベイ カンケイ キョウイク カテイ ノ セイセイ ト ホウカイ オ チュウシン ニ
  • Reviewing the Cold War History
  • 冷戦史の再検討

この論文をさがす

抄録

The Bikini incident of 1954, ushering in a new era of atomic plenty, aggravated nuclear fear and a danger of neutralism among the Japanese public. This article examines how the Japanese and U. S. governments tackled a problem of antinuclear sentiment which emerged as a hotbed for neutralism in 1954-1957. Focusing on a unique nature of Japanese antinuclear sentiment as a form of nationalism, this article sheds light upon a role of diplomacy as a communication tool to address antinuclear sentiment and nationalism.<br>This study argues that the Yoshida administration succeeded in settling an immediate problem of the Bikini incident but failed to address the question of nationalism deeply rooted in spreading antinuclear sentiment among the public. Worried about a weak leadership of the Japanese conservative government, the Eisenhower administration could not simply overlook this failure. Then it tried to directly confront the growing antinuclear sentiment through a coordinated public relations diplomacy it regarded as “education.” With “education, ” it intended to lead Japan to embrace continued nuclear-testing. This “education” failed, however, when Prime Minister Nobusuke Kishi embarked upon anti-nuclear-testing diplomacy. By positively responding to the growing nationalism embedded in the antinuclear sentiment, Kishi thought, he could win popularity for pro-American conservative LDP and therefore contain a danger of neutralism. Containment of neutralism was, ironically, exactly what the Eisenhower administration had envisaged. Kishi's diplomacy, therefore, shared the goal with U. S. educational efforts, but adopted a different approach. His diplomacy finally nullified “education, ” which raised a voice inside the Eisenhower administration calling for changing U .S. policy on nuclear testing rather than changing Japan through “education.” The eventual course of antinuclear nationalism in U. S. -Japan relations once again remained to be seen.

収録刊行物

  • 国際政治

    国際政治 2003 (134), 103-120,L14, 2003-11-29

    一般財団法人 日本国際政治学会

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ